menu |
Nyx
MBTIBase
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | |||||
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (18/11/30 22:35) tch: INTP |
(18/10/19 14:32) johncena: INTJ |
(18/07/04 09:43) Lono: INTP |
(18/07/04 06:02) Dollar Shave Club One Wipe Scottys: INTP |
(18/08/11 05:39) fg: INTP |
(18/06/11 02:15) Nyx: INTP |
(18/05/14 11:30) Doha: INTP |
public function votes | (18/06/11 02:15) Nyx: ENTP |
(18/07/11 07:04) fg: ENTP |
public enneagram votes | (18/06/11 02:15) Nyx: 5w4 |
(18/05/14 11:30) Doha: 5w6 |
(18/05/14 03:36) fg: 5w4 |
public instinctual variant votes | (18/06/11 02:16) Nyx: sx/sp |
public tritype® votes | (18/09/14 09:12) Teru Mikami: 59x |
(18/09/14 05:44) fg: 459 |
(18/09/13 07:45) switchblades: 539 |
public sociotype votes | (18/05/17 03:48) fg: ILI |
(18/06/11 02:16) Nyx: ILI |
public psychosophy votes |
public hexaco votes |
0
2018-10-05 07:48:22pm (post #3552) |
Nyx INTP 5w4 593 Sx/Sp In Russia and therefore socionics it's a sign of respect between colleagues to be referred to as "him" or "sir". You can see this in the pages written by a Russian where the type is referred to as "her" as a lack of respect but not disrespect, in translated socionic pages. 3 2018-07-10 11:33:35pm (post #2061) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST some people will. 0 2018-07-10 04:41:20am (post #2002) |
CIA ??? ??? ??? jesus man you think anyones gonna read this wall of text? 0 2018-07-10 02:08:22am (post #1985) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST ILI-Te subtype:"Appearance: The logical subtype makes an impression of a self-confident, sober-minded, rational person. Most often he is courteous, demonstrates a critical turn of mind and possesses a sense of humor. He smiles frequently but his smile seems somewhat monotonous and set. He tries to be polite, therefore doesn't always voice all of his thoughts and observations. Likes to subject things to analysis. Sometimes he seems haughty and derisive. Skeptical, ironic, and mistrustful. Trusts more in figures and facts than in hastily drawn conclusions. A good rationalizer; he is able to discern the main points and avoid engaging in tasks and projects that are futile in his opinion. Most often his figure is heavy-set and pycnic. His gait is usually quick, movements are purposeful and resolute. May actively gesticulate while speaking. Appears somewhat gusty and impulsive, but usually holds himself with integrity and calm dignity. Character: Quickly assesses a situation or a new project from the point of view of its feasibility and practicality. Likes realistic goals, while the methods of achieving them he finds himself or through intermediaries. Inclined to make rational actions. Takes note of all the details of the case presented to him, emphasizing main ones and brushing unimportant ones aside. Is able to extract maximum returns while applying minimum of effort. Capable of making accurate economic and political predictions. Encourages people to be active, but also warns against any activities that are useless in his opinion. Notices all the contradictions and imperfections of his surrounding world. Due to a developed sense of skepticism it is difficult for him to properly assess the potential of new ventures and people's abilities. While calling for prudence, he can cool any excessive enthusiasm with subtle irony. Possesses organizational skills. Tries to be able in his affairs and knowledgeable over a variety of issues. Appreciative of quality work and high qualifications. Has an interest in laws and regulations, collects necessary and interesting information. It's hard to reconvince him in an argument because he often proves his point of view supplying factual information. Sufficiently stubborn, does not yield to direct pressure. May have a wide circle of professional or business acquaintances, but rarely becomes truly close with anyone. Fearing becoming dependent on someone tries to appear self-sufficient and confident in himself. Despite this, he is often in need of moral support. Likes people who with their optimism can instill confidence in success. Critically perceives the shortcomings of others. Sometimes cannot withhold himself from making a critical remark, due to which it is difficult for him to maintain smooth relations with others. Internally emotional, but tries to be self-sustained. Dislikes falling to extremes, but if his principles are violated he may flare up. Usually restrained in expression of his feelings, dislikes making compliments, considers that it's more sincere to talk of shortcomings. In this case, with his straightforwardness may not spare another's self-esteem. Poorly tolerates discomfort, both external and internal, and therefore tries to smooth out a bad impression left by something he has said. Thrifty, economical and practical. Dislikes excesses, can suffice with less. Skillfully handles objects and finances. Good with handling his documentation. Shows creativity in handling practical matters. Can adapt and extract use from things that to others seem to have outlived their use. Modest in his appearance and in everyday life. Feels awkward claiming for himself any material privileges or rewards. Does not attribute much value to accessories, but feels insecure if his appearance does not match the tastes of his society. Rather passive when resting. Due to weak self-discipline and certain measure of inertia he underestimates the role of a healthy lifestyle, due to which his health may suffer." 0 2018-07-10 02:01:58am (post #1983) |
Doha INTJ 6w5 @NiTechnique speaks you're rather unique 0 2018-05-29 05:01:18pm (post #837) |
strawberry crisis enfp 7 I feel like people incorrectly create archetypes surrounding the Enneagram types with wings by borrowing the wings' traits instead of taking the wings for the types they represent and intuitively attaching their core to the main type's core. It's like how a lot of 7w6 vs 7w8 descriptions revolve around "nice 7" and "mean 7" while effectively erasing the "Enneagramical" meaning behind 6 and 8, instead focusing on surface traits rather than what should define those types. In other words, I think the only way you should really determine a wing is by seeing which type you would relate to in general; if you're a 5, would you be a 4 or a 6 if you couldn't be a 5? I have no opinion to give on Nyx's type, but I would keep this in mind if I were to type her. 6 2018-05-14 12:51:51pm (post #517) |
mstr-k INTP 451/541 LII Not sure about Nyx's type, though. I don't know enough about her. 0 2018-05-14 11:49:42am (post #516) |
mstr-k INTP 451/541 LII From what I understand, the difference between 5w4s and 5w6s is more about a greater connection to intuition and individuality in 5w4s case, and a focus on formal logic and adherence to systems in 5w6s case (which is seen in fg's adherence to functions). Both can be philosophical and love trivia. 0 2018-05-14 11:48:28am (post #515) |
Doha INTJ 6w5 Why not 5w6??? Based on the discord she seems to be more interested in the deep web than on the anime, video games and philosophy which is more 5w6 than 5w4. fg seems more 5w4 than her based on his comments on the Mbtibase. 5w4s are much more philosophically inclined and love trivia unlike a 5w6. 0 2018-05-14 11:39:12am (post #514) |
related entries |