| public myers-briggs votes | (19/06/21 21:17) LVNA: ENTJ | | (19/06/21 21:12) strawberry crisis: ENTJ |
| (19/02/25 11:29) nowhereman: ENFJ |
| (18/11/14 14:12) edza: ENTJ |
| (21/11/04 01:59) LadyX: ENFJ |
| (18/05/02 03:52) Taco110: ENFJ |
|
| public function votes | (18/07/10 04:15) Taco110: ENFJ | |
| public enneagram votes | (20/09/21 18:33) Lol: 3w2 | | (20/08/03 06:46) strawberry crisis: 3w2 |
| (20/03/11 23:33) LVNA: 3w2 |
| (19/03/24 09:10) Skippy Munchkin: 1w2 |
| (18/11/14 14:33) kawaii: 1w2 |
| (21/11/04 01:59) LadyX: 1w2 |
| (18/07/10 04:15) Taco110: 1w2 |
|
| public instinctual variant votes | (21/11/04 01:59) LadyX: so/sp | | (18/05/02 03:53) Taco110: so/sp |
|
| public tritype® votes | (20/07/25 23:35) LadyX: 216 | | (19/06/21 22:00) ResoluteSoul: 126 |
| (18/11/14 14:38) kawaii: 261 |
|
| public sociotype votes | (20/08/03 06:48) strawberry crisis: LSE | | (19/06/21 21:17) LVNA: LSE |
|
I kind of liked the interpretation of her in which a lot of not-so-oneish behavior could fall under “reaction formation,” but that would posit that she is driven by seeing herself as correct, moral, other One things, etc. and I don’t really believe that anymore. Her passivity in addressing some of the really serious issues surrounding her campaign and the presidential candidacy as well as how she ran her campaign just in general seems to line up better with the idea that she is more serious about cultivating the image of a fighter with strong values rather than actually doing so.
EJ is clear but not sure about the rest.