| public myers-briggs votes | (20/04/08 14:31) Diobono: INFJ | | (20/04/08 14:16) fleetingpetals1: INFJ |
| (20/03/02 23:33) bibliology: INFJ |
| (22/04/04 13:02) Tman: INJ |
|
| public function votes | (20/04/08 14:17) fleetingpetals1: INTP | | (20/02/22 18:47) Tman: INFJ |
|
| public enneagram votes | (20/04/08 14:32) Diobono: 4w5 | | (20/03/02 23:33) bibliology: 6w5 |
| (20/04/04 14:14) Tman: 4w5 |
| (20/02/22 18:37) Jacobus: 5w4 |
|
| public instinctual variant votes | (20/04/07 00:24) bibliology: sp/sx | | (20/04/04 14:15) Tman: sp/sx |
|
| public tritype® votes | (22/04/04 12:58) Tman: 415 | |
| public sociotype votes | (20/04/08 14:31) Diobono: IEI | | (20/04/08 14:16) fleetingpetals1: IEI |
| (20/04/04 14:14) Tman: IEI |
| (20/02/22 18:37) Jacobus: IEI |
|
| public psychosophy votes | (20/04/08 14:19) fleetingpetals1: EVFL | | (21/01/13 18:55) Tman: LEFV |
| (20/02/22 18:37) Jacobus: EVFL |
|
And my votes make more sense than your choice of EII for it's equivalent sociotype. Literally nothing within Gnosticism can be claimed as amounting to valuing Fi, Te, Ne, or Si.
So Jacobus, you think this ideology is best described as both 5w4 and EVFL? That doesn't make any sense! How is something supposed to be both a 5 (focused around withdrawing from emotions in order to understand the world) and L 4th(Lack of emphases on reason, dismissive about understanding the world in any kind of a systematic way.)