menu |
Gnosticism
Religion
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (20/04/08 14:31) Diobono: INFJ |
(20/04/08 14:16) fleetingpetals1: INFJ |
(20/03/02 23:33) bibliology: INFJ |
(22/04/04 13:02) Tman: INJ |
public function votes | (20/04/08 14:17) fleetingpetals1: INTP |
(20/02/22 18:47) Tman: INFJ |
public enneagram votes | (20/04/08 14:32) Diobono: 4w5 |
(20/03/02 23:33) bibliology: 6w5 |
(20/04/04 14:14) Tman: 4w5 |
(20/02/22 18:37) Jacobus: 5w4 |
public instinctual variant votes | (20/04/07 00:24) bibliology: sp/sx |
(20/04/04 14:15) Tman: sp/sx |
public tritype® votes | (22/04/04 12:58) Tman: 415 |
public sociotype votes | (20/04/08 14:31) Diobono: IEI |
(20/04/08 14:16) fleetingpetals1: IEI |
(20/04/04 14:14) Tman: IEI |
(20/02/22 18:37) Jacobus: IEI |
public psychosophy votes | (20/04/08 14:19) fleetingpetals1: EVFL |
(21/01/13 18:55) Tman: LEFV |
(20/02/22 18:37) Jacobus: EVFL |
public hexaco votes |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE And my votes make more sense than your choice of EII for it's equivalent sociotype. Literally nothing within Gnosticism can be claimed as amounting to valuing Fi, Te, Ne, or Si. 0 2020-02-22 10:27:57pm (post #7729) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE Gnosticism is not an individual, therefore it's not bound by usual typology methods in that it cannot literally have a type. Anyway, what system can claim to be perfectly consistent? 0 2020-02-22 10:24:46pm (post #7728) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI So Jacobus, you think this ideology is best described as both 5w4 and EVFL? That doesn't make any sense! How is something supposed to be both a 5 (focused around withdrawing from emotions in order to understand the world) and L 4th(Lack of emphases on reason, dismissive about understanding the world in any kind of a systematic way.) 0 2020-02-22 07:17:48pm (post #7727) |
related entries |