Albert Camus
| e | i |
| n | s |
| f | t |
| p | j |
| function | ennea | variant | socio | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
| public myers-briggs votes | (19/07/16 08:01) typometrics.tumblr: INFP |
| (19/03/04 13:53) phsc: INFP |
| (19/02/26 00:53) tman: ISTP |
| (18/12/12 10:01) hername: INFP |
| (18/11/12 10:01) Tch: INFP |
| (18/10/23 01:05) LadyX: INFP |
| (19/07/24 12:09) Eon: INFP |
| public function votes | (19/07/24 12:10) Eon: ISFP |
| (19/07/16 08:01) typometrics.tumblr: INFP |
| (19/02/11 10:30) phsc: ISFP |
| (19/02/26 00:53) tman: ISTP |
| public enneagram votes | (19/07/24 12:10) Eon: 4w5 |
| (19/07/16 08:01) typometrics.tumblr: 4w5 |
| (19/02/26 00:53) tman: 9w8 |
| (18/12/12 10:13) hername: 4w3 |
| (18/10/23 01:05) LadyX: 4w5 |
| public instinctual variant votes | (19/02/11 10:30) phsc: sp/sx |
| (19/02/10 17:36) tman: sp/sx |
| (18/12/12 10:16) hername: sp/sx |
| (18/10/27 18:03) LVNA: sp/sx |
| public tritype® votes | (19/07/24 18:11) tman: 954 | ||||
| (19/01/16 19:17) Jacobus: 459 | |||||
| (18/12/12 10:40) hername: 461 | |||||
| public sociotype votes | (19/06/07 13:07) phsc: SLI |
| (19/03/24 21:28) tman: SLI |
LVNA  How could he possibly be EII when socionics places such a high emphasis on the rational/irrational distinction? He's almost surely the latter, and the only reason I could see why someone would get to EII is because of "Delta Values." Seems like xLI is really clear with him. Contrast with Herman Hesse who always interprets his visions in a very pointed manner...doing the Jung thing where he relates his visions to cultural occurances/potentialities (very 5+6 and Ti/rational). Sx last is also a bit hard for me to accept with his Don Juan attitude, but Sp first works I think.  0
2018-10-27 06:02:56pm (post #3860) |
| related entries |