menu |
Isaac Newton
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (20/09/20 06:54) Flower-like: INTJ |
(20/05/17 20:00) Creative Mind: INTJ |
(20/04/14 09:38) KashifIrfanBhatti: INTJ |
(20/02/17 12:27) Thyssen: INTJ |
(19/11/11 15:32) Jacobus: INTJ |
(20/12/07 22:55) Tman: INTJ |
(19/05/14 13:42) fsninetwo: INTJ |
(19/07/26 16:25) phsc: INTJ |
(19/01/21 05:00) Taco110: INTJ |
(18/11/25 20:29) Tch: INTJ |
(18/11/25 16:37) Lol: INTJ |
(18/09/27 02:02) LadyX: INTJ |
(18/05/30 03:20) strawberry crisis: INTJ |
public function votes | (20/12/07 23:07) Tman: INTJ |
(20/08/05 19:24) Flower-like: INTJ |
(20/05/17 20:00) Creative Mind: INTJ |
(20/04/14 09:38) KashifIrfanBhatti: INTJ |
(19/06/16 19:03) Lol: INTJ |
(19/05/14 13:42) fsninetwo: INTJ |
(19/02/05 19:08) tch: INTJ |
(19/01/23 09:18) phsc: INTJ |
(19/01/21 05:01) Taco110: INTJ |
public enneagram votes | (20/12/07 22:55) Tman: 5w6 |
(20/05/17 20:48) Creative Mind: 5w6 |
(20/04/14 09:38) KashifIrfanBhatti: 5w6 |
(20/02/17 12:27) Thyssen: 5w6 |
(19/05/14 13:42) fsninetwo: cp5w6 |
(19/03/10 21:44) bioomer: 6w5 |
(19/06/21 12:44) phsc: 5w6 |
(19/01/21 05:00) Taco110: 5w6 |
(19/01/20 14:53) Jacobus: cp5w6 |
(18/09/27 02:03) LadyX: 5w4 |
(18/05/30 03:20) strawberry crisis: 5w6 |
public instinctual variant votes | (20/12/07 23:07) Tman: sp/sx |
(20/05/17 20:48) Creative Mind: sp/so |
(20/04/14 09:38) KashifIrfanBhatti: sp/so |
(19/05/14 14:16) Diobono: sp/sx |
(19/05/14 14:02) fsninetwo: sp/sx |
(19/05/14 14:49) phsc: sp/so |
(19/07/31 03:49) Taco110: sp/so |
(20/12/30 01:28) Jacobus: sp/sx |
public tritype® votes | (20/12/30 01:28) Jacobus: 538 |
(20/12/07 23:00) Tman: 513 |
(20/05/17 20:48) Creative Mind: 513 |
(20/04/14 09:38) KashifIrfanBhatti: 513 |
(19/09/30 21:16) phsc: 513 |
(19/07/31 03:49) Taco110: 531 |
public sociotype votes | (20/12/07 23:01) Tman: LII |
(20/05/17 20:00) Creative Mind: LII |
(20/04/14 09:38) KashifIrfanBhatti: LII |
(20/02/17 12:27) Thyssen: LII |
(19/11/11 15:32) Jacobus: LIE |
(19/10/20 23:04) tch: LII |
(19/06/16 19:03) Lol: LII |
(19/05/20 00:55) ethan : LII |
(19/05/14 12:24) Phantom: LII |
(19/01/23 09:19) phsc: LII |
(19/01/21 05:01) Taco110: LII |
(18/09/30 07:52) fg: LII |
(18/05/30 03:20) strawberry crisis: LII |
public psychosophy votes | (20/10/18 10:00) Flower-like: LFVE |
(19/11/11 15:32) Jacobus: VLEF |
(19/10/20 19:44) Thyssen: LVFE |
(19/10/15 12:14) phsc: LVFE |
public hexaco votes | (19/10/20 15:09) phsc: HEXACO |
Creative Mind INTJ 1w9 145 EIE-Ni![]() ![]() 2020-05-17 08:50:20pm (post #8215) |
phsc ![]() Newton for most of his life: INTJ INTJ 5w6 513 sp/so LII Late Newton: -INTJ INTJ 5w6 531 so/sp LII ![]() 2019-09-30 09:16:07pm (post #7184) |
phsc ![]() First, 1, Newton was really a perfectionist, a general 513 (the competence triad one could say) feature is not dealing well with failure or criticism, Newton didn't deal well with criticism or failure! he was obsessed with details and took a long time to finish his theories, wanting them to be really perfect, turns out that when he and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz were creating calculus, a few things happened, first Newton sent letters about said topic to Leibniz who was also developing calculus, both achieved results that were different, but Leibniz published it first, both were not perfect and criticism was made to both by both, Newton quickly published his version of it after, it is quite easy to imagine that Newton wasn't completely done with his version but considering that Leibniz would take the credit he published so Newton himself would get the credit, and that generate a quite long dispute - Newton did indeed find out about it earlier by the way - and what did he do? he tried to fuck Leibniz up, Newton had contacts and knew people, Leibniz did not, what happened is that england kept using Newton's method while the rest of europe were using Leibniz's? iz'? method, also may I mention that Newton wasn't only angry at Leibniz but also at Robert Hooke over the idea of gravity, who he also tried to discredit and also in both cases, even after their deaths. But then we get to what one could say makes him a tritype 4 and a sp/sx, his occult studies over alchemy and theology, may I mention Newton was a extremely unhealthy individual, you can see he was counterphobic and probably anxious as fuck but decided to fight it, that is why I vote cp5w6, and this part is algo great to show more of his 1ness, so may I start with the cliche phrase by the dude who bought and understood this stuff that being John Maynard Keynes, and he said "Newton was not the first of the age of reason, he was the last of the magicians." and now we get into the stuff, Newton was biased as fuck over religion though he changed his mind quite often during his life, at first he liked Descartes then later thought he was a idiot, that many times for many people, he believed that most of what he and other geniuses of his time knew was already known for people of the past, such as those of Ancient Greece, and that is was all lost, he also did some quite deep theological research, owned many bibles, he found out that the Holy Trinity was made like in 4th or 5th century - my memory fails me - and other things such as studies over the Temple of Solomon and some other apocalypse related things such as that the world would end in 2060, but in my opinion this was just a 5 thing, it looks very natural for him to want to know the origins of the universe and other things, he was really meticulous with his research and all of it was encoded and a secret too, he did not do it for 4 reasons and we saw that he had many 3 characteristics, over sx on this, it seems like he had religious reasons to research this or something, also he probably thought of this as more important than his actual scientific (in our modern eyes) works, also he many times mixed all of it together too, but nothing of it seems to indicate 4 to me, he might have done all of that to be unique or different but it looks like he just wanted to know and understand things, not for the intensity, also many imagine that Newton was part of secret societies and other similar things but little is known, but it was a common thing at the time and for such a isolated man a good way for him to socialize and probably with people he would enjoy doing so, there is this description of 5 sp/so which is quite similar, I don't remember where I found out about that website or it's discord, a factor of sx is being close to people and wanting to be intense, Newton died like a lone virgin, he had very few friends and quickly broke friendships with those he did not like, like John Locke, considering that some of the stuff I mentioned for 3 also affect so, I think sp/so is what makes the most sense, the fact he did not keep long contacts could be a thing agains't so but he did keep long contacts before breaking up, he just broke up easily, also some say that he might have been gay but I am unsure, but then this description of so in unhealthy people is extremely accurate, over his alchemy stuff, it is pretty obvious that before chemistry was set it was pretty hard to make sense of it, he did try to but with his religious thinking mixed in which did not help much. And I guess that is it, it fits LII very well, maybe not Se POLR that much but competition is a Se thing and he did not like it as he clearly had superiority over Leibniz and Hooke, with Ti being clearly the leading function and things that I've seen people say make him ILI such as Ni being demonstrative is interesting, as this says, it is often used in private (literally what Newton did) and important to one's world view, and I guess that's it. ![]() 2019-05-29 04:45:28pm (post #6183) |
related entries |