6w5 is such a rippp typing of him. As well as weak N. :c LII or ILI

0

That's what was always funny about the sensor phenomenologyst votes to me. Why would a mbti sensor go on and make a super analytical and autistic analysis of his perceptions. And even socio wise that fits with Ti in that tries to be 'objective' about what it analyzes and not lose itself in a solipstic way in their perceptions. The 'epoque' of judgement is very Ti ish

0

All phenomenology starts from 'physical sensations' lmao

0

honstly that may just be inferor Se talking now that I think about it.

0

You can tell the the difrence in that he was mostly focused on examing physical sensetion rather then mentle ones.

0

" I hostly think he was realy just an incredible Si user, who developed his Si so well, that it resembled Ni."

2

Honstly I thought he was a INTJ to a first. I've noticed Ni Doms tends to examen thought, maping it out the way the Ni Doms natrual thought parttrens and useing this to understand themselves and the world. At first I thought this was what heidger was doing. But no. What he's really doing is mapping out not thought proreces but senseing proceses. I hostly think he was realy just an incredible Si user, who developed his Si so well, that it resembled Ni. The difrence is subtle but it's there.

0

The basis for IDR's typing of Heidegger as ISTJ appears to be on his emphasis on "rootedness". That, and his general aim to create a philosophy of physical being while rejecting metaphysics, does actually provide an argument for his preferring Si over Ni, although not quite a strong enough one. He was more likely a rather close-minded INTJ 6w5.

0