menu |
Edmund Burke
philosopher
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (22/04/13 02:47) GIJOEBusta Cap: ESTJ |
(21/01/09 15:32) Helvetica: ESTJ |
(20/03/06 19:49) Jacobus: ENTJ |
(19/12/11 22:50) Tman: T |
(19/03/15 22:50) Taco110: ESTJ |
public function votes | (22/04/13 02:47) GIJOEBusta Cap: ESTJ |
(22/04/04 22:59) Woll Smoth: ENTP |
(21/01/09 15:32) Helvetica: ESTJ |
(20/03/06 19:49) Jacobus: ENTP |
(19/05/20 23:32) Taco110: ESTJ |
(18/08/03 05:02) fg: ESTJ |
public enneagram votes | (22/04/13 02:47) GIJOEBusta Cap: 1w9 |
(21/01/09 15:32) Helvetica: 1w9 |
(19/03/15 22:50) Taco110: 1w9 |
(18/06/04 11:35) fg: 1w9 |
public instinctual variant votes | (22/04/13 02:47) GIJOEBusta Cap: so/sp |
(21/01/09 15:32) Helvetica: so/sp |
(19/03/15 22:50) Taco110: so/sp |
(18/06/04 11:35) fg: so/sp |
public tritype® votes | (21/01/09 15:32) Helvetica: 163 |
public sociotype votes | (22/04/13 02:47) GIJOEBusta Cap: LSE |
(22/04/04 22:59) Woll Smoth: LSE |
(21/01/09 15:32) Helvetica: LSE |
(20/03/06 19:49) Jacobus: LIE |
(19/05/20 23:32) Taco110: LSE |
(18/06/04 11:35) fg: LSE |
public psychosophy votes | (20/03/06 19:21) Jacobus: FVLE |
public hexaco votes |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 1: i just explained in Aristotle's page 2: for Bacon ==> his vision of history 0 2020-03-07 01:46:07am (post #7762) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE what an awful attempt at a counterargument 1. No. There are few philosophers more clearly Te than Aristotle. The Plato/Aristotle rift was basically Ti vs Te. That's irrelevant to this page anyway. 2. Literally nothing written here is necessarily related to type. In what way was Bacon a PROGRESSIVE or a liberal anyway? 0 2020-03-07 01:44:41am (post #7761) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 1: Aristotle is not Gamma (he is LII) 2: his opposition to french revolution is more indicating of the Te/Fi spirit of british who can't stand the structuralist/ rationalist white logic of France than anything else. socionist like talanov maintain that LSE oftenremain attached to the democratic system. LIE are not conservative but progressist (like Bacon for example). LSE are conservative but not reactionnary (like Merkel or Burke). you maked an argument that could discredit Burke as LSI. Big news, no one voted him as. 0 2020-03-07 01:27:04am (post #7759) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE I can't claim any surety on how this apparent agreement on Burke's type came about, but I'll have to assume it's simply because someone read Reflections on the Revolution in France, decided on it without consulting any other works, and was able to sway some others who were pliable enough. An understandable mistake, but still a mistake. I haven't yet read On the Revolution in France, but I have read On the Sublime and the Beautiful and I feel the smattering of research I've done on Burke is adequate for me to come to a conclusion. He wasn't at all a haughty and fearful arch-conservative, but a lover of liberty and justice who believed that the idealism of the Jacobins doomed the Revolution to tyranny. He was really more of a British rationalist Goethe than anything else, he seems a rather magnanimous and fair-minded person. He values practicality, yes, but in a Gamma manner, not a Delta manner (he actually seems to quote Aristotle a lot). He doesn't hate metaphysics and abstraction (or what he refers to as such), only what he saw as their hypocritical and dangerous application in the French Revolution. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Burke,_Edmund 0 2020-03-06 09:02:45pm (post #7758) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST we can see clearly the difference between ESTJ And ENTJ by comparing him to Aristotle. both are highly focused on pragmatic decision who depnd on circumstances and that answer to a need. but Aristotle is more focused on eternity and Metaphysic, on another side Burke despise Metaphysics and abstraction and was the precursor of historicism. 0 2018-06-04 11:41:01am (post #985) |
related entries |