menu |
Phsc
Sakinorva Databank
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (21/02/26 11:07) phsc: INTJ |
(21/01/17 23:46) Jacobus: INTJ |
(20/11/02 09:33) Flower-like: ITJ |
(20/05/02 08:11) kashifirfanbhatti: INTJ |
(19/12/29 15:53) poised: INTP |
(19/12/27 16:43) Tiger: ISTJ |
(19/12/26 22:30) joaoom: INTJ |
(19/12/26 02:16) Fuzzy: INTJ |
(19/09/30 15:38) BasedGOD: INTJ |
(20/03/12 10:15) Thyssen: INTJ |
(19/09/22 20:45) ethan: INFP |
(19/09/03 12:49) Teru Mikami: N |
(19/08/01 02:50) ally: INT |
(20/01/08 23:11) Tch: INTJ |
(19/07/03 03:03) LadyX: INTJ |
(20/02/22 19:27) Tman: INTJ |
(19/06/10 15:23) jt: xNTJ |
(19/05/31 21:47) Robosheep: ENTJ |
(20/10/14 09:46) Diobono: INTJ |
(19/05/03 16:42) fg: INTJ |
(19/07/14 11:49) HairyBALLS-: INTJ |
(19/11/21 01:01) ResoluteSoul: ISTP |
(19/01/23 19:19) Taco110: INTJ |
public function votes | (21/02/26 11:07) phsc: INTJ |
(20/10/03 10:01) Flower-like: INTJ |
(20/05/24 19:38) fleetingpetals1: ENTJ |
(20/05/02 08:11) kashifirfanbhatti: INTJ |
(19/12/29 15:58) poised: INTP |
(19/12/27 16:43) Tiger: ISTJ |
(19/12/26 22:30) joaoom: INTJ |
(19/12/26 02:16) Fuzzy: INTP |
(19/09/30 15:38) BasedGOD: INTP |
(19/09/27 23:01) Thyssen: INTJ |
(19/08/02 14:34) fg: INTP |
(19/08/03 21:00) ally: INTJ |
(19/07/31 03:15) resolutesoul: ISTP |
(20/02/22 19:27) Tman: INTP |
(19/09/27 13:52) Teru Mikami: INTP |
(19/11/18 05:50) Diobono: INTJ |
(19/05/29 01:06) Taco110: INTJ |
(19/03/29 06:02) Reddit: ISTJ |
public enneagram votes | (21/02/26 11:07) phsc: cp5w6 |
(21/01/17 23:47) Jacobus: 5w6 |
(20/07/14 12:50) Flower-like: 5w6 |
(20/06/14 08:56) EverybodyLovesNi: cp5w6 |
(20/05/02 08:11) kashifirfanbhatti: 5w6 |
(20/01/08 23:11) Tch: 5w6 |
(19/12/29 15:53) poised: cp6w5 |
(19/12/27 16:43) Tiger: 6w5 |
(19/12/26 22:30) joaoom: 5w6 |
(20/01/23 18:44) Fuzzy: 5w6 |
(19/09/30 15:38) BasedGOD: cp6w5 |
(19/09/27 23:01) Thyssen: 5w6 |
(19/08/01 02:21) Ally: 5w6 |
(19/07/03 03:03) LadyX: 1w9 |
(19/06/24 14:02) Ch-ngch-ng: cp6w5 |
(19/06/10 10:31) jt: 3w4 |
(19/05/19 05:57) Phantom: 5w6 |
(19/04/20 14:56) tman: 5w6 |
(19/04/16 11:42) DIobono: 5w6 |
(19/03/29 18:12) fg: 5w6 |
(19/03/13 20:29) bioomer: 6w5 |
(19/11/21 01:01) ResoluteSoul: cp6w5 |
(19/08/29 17:36) Teru Mikami: cp6w7 |
(19/01/23 19:19) Taco110: 5w6 |
public instinctual variant votes | (21/02/26 11:07) phsc: sp/so |
(20/09/07 05:05) Flower-like: so/sp |
(20/09/12 06:06) EverybodyLovesNi: sp/so |
(20/07/18 19:16) Tman: sp/so |
(20/01/08 23:11) Tch: sp/so |
(19/12/27 16:43) Tiger: so/sp |
(19/12/26 22:30) joaoom: sp/so |
(19/12/26 02:16) Fuzzy: sp/so |
(19/09/27 23:01) Thyssen: sp/so |
(19/08/01 02:21) Ally: so/sp |
(19/07/06 05:57) ResoluteSoul: so/sp |
(19/07/03 03:03) LadyX: so/sp |
(19/11/25 15:02) Phantom: so/sp |
(19/03/29 18:12) fg: sp/so |
(19/03/29 06:03) Reddit: sp/so |
(19/01/23 19:19) Taco110: sp/so |
public tritype® votes | (21/02/26 11:07) phsc: 531 |
(20/11/18 15:48) Flower-like: 531 |
(20/06/14 08:56) EverybodyLovesNi: 531 |
(20/05/02 08:11) kashifirfanbhatti: 531 |
(19/12/27 16:43) Tiger: 146 |
(19/12/26 22:30) joaoom: 531 |
(19/10/24 19:25) Thyssen: 531 |
(19/10/08 10:01) Diobono: 531 |
(19/09/29 12:30) kawaii: 469 |
(19/09/23 22:50) Teru Mikami: 469 |
(19/08/01 02:23) ally: 513 |
(19/07/29 18:00) tman: 531 |
(19/07/03 03:03) LadyX: 153 |
(19/06/21 23:10) ResoluteSoul: 531 |
(19/05/30 23:59) Taco110: 513 |
(19/03/30 06:40) Reddit: 692 |
(19/02/27 19:56) HairyBalls-: 53x |
public sociotype votes | (21/02/26 11:07) phsc: LII |
(21/01/17 23:46) Jacobus: ILI |
(20/07/14 12:50) Flower-like: LII |
(20/05/24 19:38) fleetingpetals1: LII |
(20/05/02 08:11) kashifirfanbhatti: LII |
(19/12/29 15:53) poised: SLI |
(19/12/27 16:43) Tiger: SLI |
(19/12/26 22:30) joaoom: LII |
(19/12/26 02:16) Fuzzy: LII |
(19/09/30 15:38) BasedGOD: LII |
(19/09/27 23:01) Thyssen: LII |
(19/09/22 20:45) ethan: IEE |
(19/08/01 02:23) ally: LII |
(19/07/29 18:01) tman: LII |
(19/07/06 05:57) ResoluteSoul: LII |
(19/05/29 01:06) Taco110: LII |
(19/03/29 18:11) fg: LII |
(19/05/26 18:43) Teru Mikami: SLE |
(19/04/01 13:39) Phantom: LII |
public psychosophy votes | (21/02/26 11:07) phsc: LVFE |
(20/09/19 07:31) Flower-like: LVFE |
(20/05/24 19:38) fleetingpetals1: LVFE |
(20/01/23 18:44) Fuzzy: LVFE |
(19/12/26 22:30) joaoom: LVFE |
(19/11/25 15:02) Phantom: LVFE |
(19/10/16 14:20) fg: LVFE |
(19/10/16 12:02) Tman: LVFE |
(19/10/15 01:43) Thyssen: LVFE |
public hexaco votes | (19/10/24 19:25) Thyssen: HEXACO |
phsc ![]() The thing is, if Te > Ti and such, why INTJ and not ENTJ? even I have been unsure since lately I've kind of changed my mind on some Se aspects of my life. Anyway, the functions are crap just like the rest of typology so I sort of don't care anymore, may I ask, what function system are you applying? what source/how did you learn about them and such, and if it is just like a weird mix, how did you get into such definitions and maybe... write them out? ![]() 2020-11-26 06:07:11am (post #8574) |
Flower-like INFP 4 ![]() ![]() 2020-11-21 11:41:32am (post #8557) |
fleetingpetals1 4w5 Sx/Sp EVFL![]() ![]() 2020-05-21 07:44:07pm (post #8223) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2020-05-21 04:19:27am (post #8222) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-12-26 03:50:51am (post #7557) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-12-26 02:47:19am (post #7555) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-11-23 11:46:51am (post #7459) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-10-25 01:07:57am (post #7322) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST![]() ![]() 2019-10-25 12:59:39am (post #7319) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-10-25 12:46:59am (post #7317) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST![]() ![]() 2019-10-25 12:44:22am (post #7316) |
phsc ![]() But then I agree I fit Ni very well, just happens that considering aspects not very well shown here because there is not really many ways for me to do that here I believe I also have a very strong use of Te (mostly in real life but there is no way for you know if this is true) and internally Fi but then that is also even harder, I mean I really don't think I fit Se > Ni, it kind of looks like I am only considering lyrics but I actually do not purely do that, you can see I typed a few instrumental pieces and other Pink Floyd songs but it really has not much reasoning to it but like I'd type Echoes as INJ INTJ LII 5w4 541 sx/sp and it has some reasoning to it but then there are multiple ways to interpret such song (the one I believe the most is extremely not literal but it still follows the lyrics in a metaphorical way and the song developement as in purely instrumental and also fits the music theory behind it and some other aspects such as the experimental aspects of let's say inverting wah-wah pedals) but then it all depends on how you define functions and you still haven't mentioned what definitions you use which makes it extremely hard for me to make an actual argument and not fight for arbitrary uses of words (variables) for different concepts which is completely arbitrary after all for pure reasons sake! tl;dr what definitions/authors do you follow, if you follow none and you just have your view of the functions then uh define them? also read the straw article if you haven't already ![]() 2019-10-24 12:37:14pm (post #7313) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-10-24 12:27:05pm (post #7310) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-10-24 12:23:01pm (post #7308) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-10-23 01:50:06pm (post #7289) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2019-10-14 06:49:46pm (post #7233) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-10-14 06:27:02pm (post #7232) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() I'm VELF, as if you were curious. ![]() 2019-10-14 06:17:32pm (post #7231) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-10-14 05:51:37pm (post #7230) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() First position is, of course, the one you value most and the one most prominent in your character. Second is the one your most relaxed with and the one you use most when interacting with others. Third is the "conflict" position, i.e. the one where you'll take a contrarian or contradictary stance on. Fourth is obviously the one you value least, but still plays a role in your character as the antithesis of what you value most. You come across as an LVFE, based on what I know of you: https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&tab=wT&authuser=0&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20140408215506%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.strannik.de%2Flovesyntax%2F24_lwpe.htm ![]() 2019-10-14 05:44:55pm (post #7229) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-10-14 12:30:27am (post #7228) |
BasedGOD ESTP 8w9 SLE Supreme Cock Leader ![]() 2019-09-30 03:51:13pm (post #7182) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-09-28 11:15:02pm (post #7171) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-09-28 11:12:41pm (post #7170) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-09-23 10:36:22pm (post #7088) |
phsc ![]() 5-3-1: one of the most cold-blooded and self-controlled of the Fives, this tritype is remarkably efficient, hard-working and competent, although a little bit anal as well. They demand recognition for their contributions and are fairly concerned with their image and intellectual value. Somewhat self-righteous and impatient with others, they are however pragmatic and tactful enough not to compromise their goals by being too inflexible. These Fives are very clever, self-confident, perfectionist, arrogant and glacial. flavors: cold, composed, efficient and self-important 5-1-3: Most scientific and remote Five. Most technical. Uncomfortable with intense feelings. 5-1-3: exacting, methodical, organized and fairly self-righteous, these Fives have a compulsive need for logic and order in their environment. They are hard-working and more practical and pragmatic than other Fives, focusing on the efficiency and improvement of the systems that interest them. They also enjoy and expect receiving the deserved recognition for their efforts, considering their time and involvement very precious. This tritype is one of the most cool-headed, rigid and self-controlled. flavors: exigent, methodical, formal and efficient (for some reason the dude wrote two different descriptions for the same tritype? also what "a little bit anal" means is beyond my knowledge) Both fit quite well, unsure which fits the best. So those who voted on me for tritype, bring up the arguments ![]() 2019-09-23 10:18:16pm (post #7087) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-08-31 11:06:22pm (post #7039) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() The LII can easily understand whether something is impractical or not, but prefers to explain why using structural principles. He dislikes rote memorization of dates and the like, but paradoxically will often have a mental store of many arcane pieces of information (such as the first 100 digits of pi) he finds interesting or equally absurd technical skills (like mastering a video game). Such skills and information will either be a part of his leisure activities, or relate directly to his main interests, which he chooses not based on their immediate practical consequence, but on how interesting they are. ![]() 2019-08-31 05:55:19am (post #7033) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-08-30 11:51:27pm (post #7028) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-08-04 04:19:17pm (post #6895) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-08-04 04:18:11pm (post #6894) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-08-04 04:15:30pm (post #6893) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-08-04 04:14:28pm (post #6892) |
jt ISFJ 1 <3 fg <3 fg ![]() Remember the words "I love you" To explain the law of attraction I'd need a smilar concept. I realize "birds of a feather flock together" is vague and overused so instead ask a question... hmmm. phsc is prbably someone who doesn't like the idea of a private message feature in a website like this. I dunno if you have an account in personality cafe. I recommend you make one . ![]() 2019-08-04 06:49:35am (post #6887) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-08-02 08:02:33pm (post #6873) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-08-02 02:02:58pm (post #6871) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-08-02 01:52:36pm (post #6870) |
phsc ![]() I constantly say that Teru is ENTP, he is a clear Ne Ti user, he has tertiary Fe which I talk about in a comment I made not long ago talking about him and Based, he's good at it but he doesn't care and still offends people, that's the thing, I literally said that, why are you telling me something I literally already told you? also please don't compare yourself to me. ![]() 2019-08-02 05:51:47pm (post #6869) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-08-02 05:46:39pm (post #6868) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-08-02 05:44:37pm (post #6867) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-08-02 05:44:10pm (post #6866) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST![]() ![]() 2019-08-02 04:39:21pm (post #6865) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-08-02 12:25:49pm (post #6864) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST![]() ![]() 2019-08-02 04:02:00pm (post #6863) |
phsc ![]() gods-commandments is for making fun out of people, niggas-of-the-round-table is for actual organization for roles and etc, complaints-suggestions has a name that explains it, wall-of-fame is to post the worst things people say (cena is the most common on it btw), reception also explains itself, kek-or-cringe is to post memes, contraband is for bots, scottys-solitary-confidenement-chambers is for making fun out of people (by far scotty being the biggest target), nanjing-massacre is for in a general jokes which tends to involve asian people, cathartic-outrage too, racist-factoids is for jokes related to racism and similar, doomer-playlist is to post music, therapy-60-bucks-an-hour is for memes and big-5-neuroticism was to make fun out of diobono, you see things have an use and are quote often used, some less than others, the biggest source of chaos on it is the vast amount of alt accounts and random friends of Based that join it for no reason at all, I also really like how Galaxy's server is structured, I do believe rules are important, and I do think things could be organized, if you take a look I do use a decent way of writing in my comments, when I finish talking about a topic or a set of topics I go to a new line and end with the dot and other things, while someone like jt doesn't and I find that annoying, actually there are a few things by you I find annoying and you know that, I think it was LadyX or Jacobus that pointed out you weren't using capitalization for names and that annoys me, or how tman writes like crap, hell I think if we go by organization as by how things are said I am even more criterious than you, going back to the academical level of competence topic, to a certain extent I consider it here, I do not bother correcting jt's or tman's mistakes because I think that they're dumb, while I do bother arguing with you or Teru or other people who have more neurons than chromosomes. On the message style, size should not be considered, take someone like Teru, he does use short messages to pass his general message, while it is still different from you and me, he does it in a short way and I believe he is ENTP (clear use of Ne as in he is creative, makes fun out of people, is able to do that while arguing which indicates Ti because he doesn't care about who says a thing, but in his case it is not always about adding content to the conversation but instead also making it more interesting, we also do that but he of course does it way more, you being the least and someone like tman also constantly does that but still less than Teru, but his messages are still short), the thing with my comments is that I want to put as much content as I can in them to make sure there will be no doubts, I believe that making a single comment explaining and points I can see and developing them well is better than letting many doubts go on, someone who actually doesn't care about that and writes a lot would be tman, he doesn't develop on things. And now here is a thing, relationships in socionics aren't from an aware position yet from a logical one, in my head I know how relationships work as by socionics but in real life I am actually extremely terrible with that, being a 5 it goes towards isolation, the biggest reason I learned that is to see how I could apply that, a good example of me being terrible with Fe is being unable to realize I was offending Jaden who is a person that joined Galaxy's server and later Saki's and left because he considered me as being offensive but I truly didn't realize I was, I was just questioning him, that is explained by socionics because he was IEE and I am LII, supervisor relationship which has one's base function constantly triggering the others polr, you can see that happening when I talk to cena or Based, or to a certain extent you and Teru (I believe Teru is ILE and I will make a big comment explaining why in a close future), but then I wasn't able to see that because he had himself as IEI (I started questioning it quickly and that only helped towards making him annoyed) but truly didn't realize I could be being offensive, Teru originally believed I was ILE because I insult people without realizing too, I actually believe that the relationship part of socionics is the best because it can be used to help me solve said problems I have in my life, it explains quite well why I don't have a good relationship with my parents (SEE and IEE) truly not being able to understand why before or why my mom acted the way she did, it is not really feelings, it can also be logical, a Ti polr won't be logical many times as in how they act with people, SEEs are fucking cancerous, I don't care about people's feelings as in what they feel towards what I type them but what they feel towards others can indicate compatibility which makes things just make more and more sense, and I do agree that INTP is much better than ISTP for me. But there are other things which aren't shown well online but in real life they do more, I am a quite effective person in what I do, and I can be quite a workaholic which is not a very INTP by functions trait (fits Te ignoring quite well too), I am also extremely future oriented but this is hard to see online and it is also related to socionics Ni which is the demosntrative which does not show that well, I am going to study in probably the best brazilian university for computer science (it is debatable) at 17 which is interesting (most people that get on it have to study a few years after high school, also may I mention I just wouldn't get into it earlier because of stupid arbitrary age limits for joining universities set by the brazilian government) and that also indicates that I care about academical competence but not for online arguments (it can also be quite a enneagram 3 thing which I clearly have in my tritype), I also relate a lot to the insight aspect of most definitions of cognitive functions Ni (I want to know what specific ones you use), and I clearly don't live in the moment but not like one who is Se blind yet one who is Se inferior (check the DOTA comments, that game is very cognitive function Se-ish), I also relate much more to Fi than Fe but that is a little bit harder to show and still quite terrible, as kawaii says, I am emotionally retarded, the ones who talk to me the most, these being Teru, Taco, kawaii, all agree with Fe blind (unsure about kawaii since I did not ask him but considering what he says about me it fits) because the closer you get to me the more that is visible, all that has been said until now fits my function tests results, which goes like Te = Ti > Ni > Ne > Si > Fi > Se > Fe and I asked some people to order that (kawaii said the same order for me), and I don't believe I have secondary Ne because I am not creative in that way more in the insight way which comes out of nowhere but quite developed, which is why I believe it is hard to type me by cognitive functions, but as one who uses mostly definitions by Beebe (Taco also does), the way he explains Se inferior/anima, Ti critic/witch, Si demon and Fe trickster fits so well with me I believe INTJ is the way to go, but I am unsure if you even know about his definitions, which is the problem with having only one function vote, maybe there could be one for IDRlabs, another for Jung as by personality types related, another for Beebe, one for whatever tman uses, etc. ![]() 2019-08-02 03:53:33pm (post #6862) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-08-02 11:10:12am (post #6861) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-08-02 02:51:37pm (post #6857) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST![]() ![]() 2019-08-02 02:34:28pm (post #6855) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-08-01 05:24:46pm (post #6833) |
phsc ![]() Tman it does not fit Ne blind because hacking is within a Ti framework you don't know, you need to find out about it, which is Ne because it is all about possibilities, mostly the starting point, also you ignore many things, how the fuck am I a Se user? you're ignoring all the questions I make such as what are your sources? what do you use? what definitions exactly? also how does EXTP fit? ESTP is a Se dom with pretty good use of Fe I mean they're really not socially awkward at all and how the fuck does ENTP who fucking leads with Ne fit if I am Ne blind? also how doesn't INTJ fit while Fe blindness makes a lot of sense? I mean I don't believe you're going to change your opinion anymore but may I ask, how am I Ne blind by your magical function magic and somehow LII by socionics which has creative Ne while both definitions are basically the same? inb4 u vote LSI ![]() 2019-08-01 04:08:36pm (post #6831) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-08-01 02:19:35pm (post #6826) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-08-01 02:18:41pm (post #6825) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ILI > LII tbh. ![]() 2019-08-01 06:31:40am (post #6824) |
ally entp 3w4 ile![]() ![]() 2019-08-01 02:54:03am (post #6808) |
phsc ![]() I listed examples of me using Ne in a few comments ago, the one I mention hacking, you're just ignoring that, I also lack any form of Fe but let's ignore that, Fi fits much better, I mean see Fi users, mike is a good example for that, I am INTJ and I am Fe blind and not Ne or Se blind, Ti framework can be explained by the LII INTJ combination, also ESTP is ridiculous but I want you to vote me ESTP so it looks like you're extremely dumb and then I can joke about that with an actual ESTP (someone like Based), also ESTP LII is an amazing combination. I did give examples about me not being Ne blind, I am seeing the bigger picture and it does not fit with what you say, I don't do that in a limited way, when do I do that other than here? I want you to show examples because that is how typology works, if we stop following that I can just say that you're any type based on a small amount of evidence and THAT DOESN'T FIT THE BIGGER PICTURE, you're literally ignoring me talking about how I use Ne, Teru mentions my "Ne rambling" as a thing that indicates INTP over INTJ, I am not ignoring them, it is just that there is nothing that indicates that, that 98% is extremely arbitrary and out of your ass, but I don't care about your opinion anyway, you're literally ignoring Se as it tends to be, your concept of Fe makes no sense and I am clearly not Ne blind, but there is a reason enlighted people call that shit function magic, because your definitions are so different from everyones else, what sources do you use? twisted Beebe ala CS Joseph? or what? IDRLabs for sure not, which is why Diobono votes INTP, Taco and I use Beebe and INTJ fits extremely well, Teru I am unsure, well I have no problem with flat earthers or antivaxxers so why would I have a problem with you saying I am ISTP? you're the one ignoring the bigger picture and only taking examples from this "debate", you literally ignore everything else, hypocritical but that's not new tbh. ![]() 2019-07-31 08:19:17pm (post #6804) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-07-31 07:23:46pm (post #6801) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-07-31 03:01:13pm (post #6798) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-07-31 03:33:53am (post #6793) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-07-30 01:43:40pm (post #6781) |
phsc ![]() Tman, the first impressions matter a lot, Ni and Te are very common in programming but hacking is more Ne and Ti, but now you fall into a big problem: >I don't have proof you're Ne blind >I don't ahve proof you're not Ne blind First of all, I made a few arguments about how I am not Ne blind in older comments, but me possibly not being Ne blind just makes ISTP more ridiculous, I believe Fe blindness makes much more sense, you're now ignoring two functions instead of one, Se and Ne, thats 25% of the system. ![]() 2019-07-30 12:30:18pm (post #6775) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-07-30 08:02:24am (post #6771) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST![]() Tman: i won't change my mind about Phsc's competency because of a fight he have with you.I can see where you ISTP vote (ti dom+fe inferior could work for him) come from but i disagree with your argumental basis, your focus on loop, grip and other bullshit theory that made me abandon the cognitive function system for socionics, you focus too much on a Ti-Ni perspective for him that you even considered INFJ above INTJ for him which is very umprobable as an order of possibility for him. i think you should instead if he show Ne over Se. and he is obviously Ne over Se (too much focus on possibilities for a Ne blind). so if he is IXTP, he is INTP. you tend too much too just heterodoxical path that rarely came from nowhere but i think you use the wrong patterns. Phsc: i think you are too disdaignous about the cognitive function system. of course it have a ton of bullshit but let's face it all typology system have this kind of problem (socionics got most of the reinin dichotomy and gulenko's cognitive style as example), enneagram have a big unexplained part about the wing correlation with type etc... calling it "function magic" like most sheep in here is kind of low for someone as competent as you. ![]() 2019-07-30 03:53:52am (post #6770) |
LadyX intp 5 ![]() I voted a "1" due to the periodic expressions of anger, along with a perfectionistic outlook on spelling and other things - an alternative might be a "5" going to counterphobic mode. Many times I've seen a fun person just enjoying the absurdity of some of the entries and making key contributions. ![]() 2019-07-30 05:27:12am (post #6767) |
phsc ![]() It does not matter, it is extremely clear I value truth over anything else, I don't see how I don't care about truth, all I am doing this over is because you have a wrong vote and I want you to explain Be blindness but you don't so I think you're being retarded and that annoys me, I am the one who values truth over anything else, you're the one who doesn't argue and keeps on talking about me not giving value to truth while I clearly do, I will quote the user Based which might start using saki now but the last time someone used the term pwnage Michael Jackson was still alive, I clearly care but you ignore it, I wouldn't question your typings if I did not care for fucks sake, I truly could easily change my mind if you explained how I am Ne blind but you did not and that annoys me, also the fact that the vote is wrong too, also unsure if you realized but I am almost never offended by anything, I truly believe words cannot hurt, Teru and Based constantly insult me and I don't really care, if you care about truth you'd ignore all of that. ![]() 2019-07-30 01:13:31am (post #6766) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-07-30 03:00:15am (post #6763) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI If I rember correctly I called you all those thing after you said I was the stupidest person you had ever seen, so you fired the first shot. All I did was type you baddly. If all you care about are the ideas, then spelling errorers can be ingored, can't they? You understood what I meant. So it's almost like this wasn't about logic at all. It's almost like it was about proving you were better then me, becuse you looked down on me.It's almost like this entire converstation was a just an attempt to one up me. Like they don't care about truth, but about ponage. Working in good faith matters, becuse otherwise, your wasting your time on someone who dosn't vaule truth. But your most recent post has shown me that's may not be true. You may just be an honset guy whose having a bad day. You seem to really want to know. I meant what I said about that desire for "inelcutal pownge." I also meant what I said about that kind of thinking being unhelpfull and dumb.I told myself that what I wanted was to not waste my time on a discution with someone who didn't care. But mabye there's a part of me that just didn't want to admit that I couldn't rember why I thought you were Ne blind. I need to be I'm okay having been wrong, so long as it helps me towrds being right. ![]() 2019-07-30 02:57:59am (post #6762) |
phsc ![]() I am not saying everything should be about the arguments, I'm talking about how you didn't say shit to explain me being Ne blind, I was talking about how everyone hates you because you LITERALLY SAID I WAS RIDICULOUS AND IMMATURE AND THAT PEOPLE DON'T TAKE ME SERIOUSLY, it is like "haha you're weak" and then the dude shows that compared to you he's way stronger, I just want you to explain how I am Ne blind and not talk about fg using Ni or things that aren't really Ne blind yet someone angry at one who doesn't argue, I don't care about the reason you left but the thing is is that you still left, and you talk about how you could just not reply to me at all which is indirectly saying "I say shit and don't support it with arguments", being angry doesn't make things different but you keep putting focus on that, "I left because you were angry" which changes nothing, angry or not I'm pretty good with logic, and I wasn't angry I was baffled by stupidity, acting in good faith means nothing, what you're doing is literally an ad hominem to justify not explaining your argument, a tldr of it is: 1 - you're Ne blind 2 - I am not going to explain it because you are not worth of my time See? you don't support 1 at all, you keep talking about 2, and it is literally an ad hominem, YOU BY MY SUBJECTIVE CONCEPT OF WORTH EXPLAINING TO ISN'T WORTH EXPLAINING WHY I AM RIGHT TO SO I AM NOT GOING TO EXPLAIN, you don't have an argument other than attacking me by saying I'm not worth your time, but okay tman, you're retarded anyway, your logic would be quickly debunked by me but since you have no argument, your ISTP vote is simply ridiculous, good thing other people made good votes in my poll, and you have ridiculous votes in other polls too, at least I was able to achieve you're an INFP and not an INTP out of this. ![]() 2019-07-30 01:41:20am (post #6760) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-07-30 12:18:30am (post #6759) |
phsc ![]() Running from it I can say you have no arguments, you literally just said "Ne blind" and did not bother explaining it other than the example of me angry at you because you were not explaining it and even then that isn't directly Ne blind, it is also clear that I am Fe blind and not Ne blind lmao, it is clearly not Ne and even then it is not the problem everyone has one, now you're just acting like you're right (even tho you didn't actually show any examples of Ne blindness in me AND ALSO IGNORED WHAT I MENTIONED RELATED TO IT). You're so ridiculous with your "kafkatrapping" in this, you believe I am ISTP, then I act and then you try to view it as an ISTP would view it, instead of actually showing that I am Ne blind: "It's possible you didn't know that, and that I was just saying "You're an ISTP becuse you suck."" I am not viewing it as that, that is extremely obvious, but the thing is THAT I AM NOT ISTP, Taco is ISTP, he fits Ne blind perfectly, talking to him about him being you he was thinking it was an absolute truth, not considering that it is just a possibility, actual Ne blind person, I am not, again you didn't show any examples of Ne blindness and all you did was "explain" things as they would be if I were ISTP and I clearly am not, ridiculous, my arguments aren't insults, you don't have an argument other than your dogmatic Ne blind "thinking". ![]() 2019-07-29 11:31:54pm (post #6758) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-07-29 11:24:16pm (post #6757) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI "I'm not sure if you realized but everyone in this website thinks you're retarded..." "that you're extremely stupid, you're wasting your time spending a single second in this website unsure if you realized that already, "benefit of the doubt", lmao, thing is tman, for me to refute a thing you need to have a thing." "Just that you're extremely stupid, you're wasting your time spending a single second in this website unsure if you realized that already, "benefit of the doubt", lmao, thing is tman, for me to refute a thing you need to have a thing ." "I am not doing hysterical screaming, I am just quesitoning you being a retard... you also are being hypocritical because you also did virtual screaming WHEN TYPING LIKE THIS, which indicates you could be Taco which is a valid theory not many people join this community, and Taco likes trolling" Latter in the argmunt I said this: "Okay, your starting to sound as incoherent as I normally do, but angerer. I'm glad senpai FG likes your work, but that was before today's outburst. I'm not sure if he will respond as positively to your recent comments.I don't wanna speak for him, but he doesn't strike me as a guy who responds well to hysterical screaming. I'm not saying your not a decent typest, or that your dumb. I'm saying your behaving inmaturly. 4w5 makes sense for me, as I've already said, based on how I act on this cite. I use the term "asburgers" when I meant "autistic", which you had mentioned before you might be. It's not a dirty word man. I can see why you would think I was using it as an insult, and for that I really do owe you an apology. I'm gonna give you an hour or two to calm down. Don't expect any responses till then." And your respond with. "I am not behaving in a imature way, first of all maturity is not even objective, you're just running from the arguments using a crappy ad hominem about me not being mature because you don't have arguments, literally a sophist." ... Yes. Clearly, I am the one making ad hominin attacks. None of these comments count as ad homin falcies, becuse I never said "you were rude, therefor you wrong about MBTI," and you never said "Your an idiot, therefor your wrong about MBTI." Insults are not in and of themselves adhomin attacks. An adhomin attack is attack somone personily in odder to despuite there argument. I am not requiered to have converstations with people who constaly call me a retard. Even if I do end up leaving, you wouldn't be able to claim it was becuse I didn't have any argemnts, becuse it could just as easly be that I was tiered of being insulted. Forchenetly I'm more board then I am teired of being insulsted. Having a "blind" funtion isn't a bad thing, evey type has one in most theores I've (often by difrent names.) Think of it less as "Blind" like Steve Wonder, and more like a blind spot, something that can trip you up, or that you can fail to take into consideration. It's possible you didn't know that, and that I was just saying "You're an ISTP becuse you suck." These qoutes prove nothing. Phsc could just as easaily take everthing I've said out of context in order to prove what a jerk I am. If you wanna know what happened, look back at the qoutes yourself. ![]() 2019-07-29 11:12:17pm (post #6756) |
Taco110 Ni-Se you'll see ST![]() ![]() 2019-07-29 09:45:46pm (post #6755) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-07-29 09:22:33pm (post #6754) |
Taco110 Ni-Se you'll see ST![]() ![]() 2019-07-29 09:20:59pm (post #6753) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-07-29 09:19:42pm (post #6752) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-07-29 09:14:43pm (post #6751) |
kurapika isfp 4w3 SEI weo ![]() ![]() 2019-07-29 09:05:52pm (post #6750) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-07-29 08:52:09pm (post #6748) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-07-29 04:51:24pm (post #6747) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-07-29 08:43:20pm (post #6746) |
phsc ![]() Also I forgot to say that nobody takes you seriously, you're a joke in this website, you're the worst typist by far, Taco, Teru, fg, kawaii, even GalaxyStrider make fun out of you, you also spell like crap most of the time which also made Diobono make fun out of you and makes everybody not take you seriously. ![]() 2019-07-29 08:30:05pm (post #6745) |
phsc ![]() No it doesn't sound like I have "blind Ne" because I don't have blind Ne, I am not terrible at that, you're stupid that's the thing, I literally say THERE IS A POSSIBILITY YOU'RE NOT ENTIRELY WRONG ALSO SAID THAT IN YOUR PROFILE BUT YOU DON'T ARGUE, you don't explain your thinking. INFJ could work if you believe more advanced function magic stuff such as "loops" because Ni Ti fits extremely well, blind Te yes that does make sense, by the way you're using Beebe definitions most likely which goes with what Taco uses too, interesting! I didn't say Se has to do with social skills, you're fucking stupid, people tend to correlate it to impulsivity, living in the moment, I don't do that, physical awareness is also a joke to me. Tman, I am taken seriously, I'm pretty sure most people here consider me as a good typist, fg constantly likes my comments so I know at least someone takes me seriously, the fact NiTech asked me to explain my SLI vote could also indicate that, Taco also considers me a good typist but since there is a possibility you are him you know that, also I am not hard headed it's just that you're extremely stupid, you're wasting your time spending a single second in this website unsure if you realized that already, "benefit of the doubt", lmao, thing is tman, for me to refute a thing you need to have a thing, saying I am ISTP because I have Ti and you believe I don't have Ne without explaining how I don't have Ne does nothing, you literally just said I don't consider possibilites while I do it's just that when I think of Elon Musk as ESFP it's ridiculous, nothing fits, you don't write in detail because you cannot, because you are completely stupid, also please put me down want to see you do it, genius. A few examples of Ne by me was well, hacking is very Ne, it's about thinking about possibilities and finding flaws in the system, me considering you as 4w5 instead of 5w4, ResoluteSoul, many and many votes made by me, you also didn't give examples of Ne blind, I'm called you retarded because you aren't giving examples, the example is me annoyed because you don't give examples of me being Ne blind, I also mentioned that in a comment I made in your poll because of the two possibilities for your type, either a retarded Ti user or someone who makes shit out of oblivion with bias and other shit. I am saying you are wrong because you are not explaining things not because I think it is impossible for you to be right and cannot think about said things being possibly true, it is because I DID CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY AND IT STILL MAKES NO SENSE, and now all you did is define Ne, then say I'm bad at it, explain how fg argues using Ni and I also use Ni in my arguments because I am similar to fg in that, then you talk about blind Ni which also has nothing to do with it, I am not an ISTP of any form in any system, I really am the opposite of "whats the point of arguing", also even then I love how you contradict yourself because LII has creative Ne in socionics which isn't far from function magic Ne you described, what a genius. ![]() 2019-07-29 08:24:27pm (post #6744) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-07-29 08:16:59pm (post #6743) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI Gee bad at Fe? Never would have geused, your such a charming fellow :P. This kind of outbust is the kinda shit I'm talking about (look at Teru's page for more examples of it.) This is what happens when you get a frustrated Fe infierorer. For an example of this in my self, look at Jean Pual Sartes page, and you'll see me doing something simliler. This kind of outburst is not typical of Fe blind. It is of Fe infeiror. The fact you react this way shows blind Ne. I know that sounds like I'm saying I'm gonna say you have blind Ne no matter what, but bare with me. Ne is the ability to see multiple possibility in the abstract, understanding new ideas in the moment. PHSC, your utterly terrible at that. FG for example (INTJ) tends to argue with me mostly using Ni, but tends to acknowledge there could be at least some possibility I'm not entirely wrong, even when I really am kinda full of shit. You can kinda tell internally he has no idea what I'm on about, (once again, most of the time it's because I have incomplete information) but his response is to simply say he disagrees, and either leave it at that, or polity tell me why he thinks I'm wrong. Blind Ni means that you don't consider there to be value in considering purely abstract musings of other people, especially when it contradicts your Ti-Ni. In the other ISTP I know, this comes out very differently, more of a "whats the point of arguing" kind way, because he doesn't think he'll change his mind, and kinda assumes others are the same way, but I think the core cause is the same. INFJ is a terrible typing I'll give you that. I'm pretty sure you have at least some of the INFJ functions. INFJ doesn't really work though, you're pretty clearly a low Fe user, probably as a fourth function. Unless you just have a REALY underdeveoped 2nd function, which asburgers might impair, but you DEFENTLY don't have blind Te. Why do you assume Se has anything to do with social skills? I chose to ignore Se because, quite frankly, I'm not sure what I would be looking for. Se is my blind function, so I have a very abstract, skeletal framework understanding of what it is and dose, so I'm not sure how easily I could find it in other people. Hence why I left it to you to deiced. If you want to be taken seriously and given peoples time and energy, I suggest you stop acting like a petulant child. I really hope your not just another asshole on the internet, and that your not this hard headed in real life, because otherwise, I just wasted a lot of my time. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, because, beneath your temper tantrums, you have points worth responding to. I think your right in that I need to form more detailed arguments, but If you can't disagree with me in the future without resorting to hysterical hissy fits and petty insults, I won't wast my time. I'll respond, but I see no reason to write in any kind of detail. There's a part of me that wants to use this in an attempt to put you down, because I'm pretty annoyed right now. But I don't think that part of me is very helpful, and you don't really desire that after being kinda a jerk on the internet once, so I'm hoping I'm this doesn't come of as an intellectual dick meseruing contest. Debate shouldn't be about trying to get "ponege." ![]() 2019-07-29 07:55:02pm (post #6742) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-07-29 03:31:55pm (post #6741) |
phsc ![]() Also how the fuck am I fucking ISTP? how dumb are you? how am I blind Ne? literally you say that I am not blind Fe which is extremely obvious Jacobus even mentioned that I could have aspergers and I am socially awkward as fuck but then you fucking say I am a Se user? what related to the current moment do I have? you're literally ignoring a function, and if you're going to ignore it why not even INFJ as you mentioned? You fucking say X and don't explain X, "oh I don't see blind Fe" WHY DON'T YOU SEE BLIND FE, "oh I see you're Ne blind" WHY AM I NE BLIND? unsure if you realized but everyone in this website thinks you're retarded, maybe you might be right about all of your stupid votes and maybe they aren't stupid but you don't explain them, not even fucking jt who literally RANDOMIZES TYPES FOR PEOPLE is this bad with typology, really, congratulations, you might be the dumbest person I've ever fucking seen. ![]() 2019-07-29 06:46:41pm (post #6739) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-07-29 06:43:47pm (post #6738) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-07-29 06:38:53pm (post #6737) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-07-29 06:34:46pm (post #6736) |
phsc ![]() also I'm probably not a full N too but since being N is like "better" you can keep that I guess ![]() 2019-07-29 06:24:10pm (post #6735) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-07-26 03:20:14pm (post #6715) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-06-30 03:31:36am (post #6532) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-06-29 07:17:38pm (post #6530) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-06-29 03:10:53pm (post #6529) |
phsc ![]() also why doesn't it appear on the front page wtf ![]() 2019-06-29 07:05:11pm (post #6528) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-06-29 03:04:50pm (post #6527) |
phsc ![]() test test test TEST TEXT ![]() 2019-06-29 06:35:35pm (post #6526) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-06-26 02:37:17pm (post #6518) |
phsc ![]() nigga cat ![]() 2019-06-26 02:34:39pm (post #6517) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() The sensory subtype is witty and impulsive. While seemingly concealing within them latent threats they appear unappeasable. However, they are sharp, aggressive and persevering people. Notably resourceful, they are able to manifest vindictiveness in doses that make life for their ill-wishers simply intolerable. Their character appears full of contrasts and unpredictability. Towards those whom they love they are often tender, even sentimental. Their sense of humor easily incorporates sarcasm and caustic irony. Are talkative, charming, witty, critical and sharp, love epithets and slang expressions. Their movements are fast and gait centered, When walking their slightly bent knees provide them with an ingratiating feline resemblance. Appreciate life and tend to watch over their health, periodically exercising through sports/gymnastics. Dresses tastefully and expensively. Usually provide a bright impression of a self-assured and prospering person Character The persistent, energetic and determined man. Seeking his acts both directly and through intermediaries. He usually manages to become a winner. Knows how to manage people, they can impose their will and desire, draws useful and interesting things. Knows how to please: charming, humorous, a good conversationalist. It's a natural leader: it requires a struggle, the excitement, winning, without its vitality declines. Boredom - his mortal enemy. The lack of decent employment of forces makes it very difficult partner. Configured for large real purpose, but often have difficulty in choosing them. Long swings, doubts, considering. But if the choice is made, acts quickly, picking up the pace and not calming down until it succeeds. This is a very resourceful and flexible tactics. Active and energetic, in periods of expansion develops uncommon performance. He does not like unsolicited advice, preferring to make their own decisions. Maybe listen to the interlocutor, but the last word is usually reserves. Clerk does not make a tone when it pressured - strongly fighting back. In the interest of the case shows diplomatic skills, courtesy and kindness. It does not like it when others take the initiative, it may seem out of place: for example, something imposed or rushed - in this case can do the opposite. Very proud and touchy, but tries to hide it, considering his weakness. Do not forgive tactlessness and injustice to himself. This may cause him outbreak of aggression. Insightful, witty, has a critical mind. In anger, showing intolerance to others' shortcomings. Knows how to give a brief description of the man, and capacious, with ridicule in the case of the presence of strangers, "put in a puddle." Actively promotes the interests of their own, and loved ones. Undesirable people could create an unfavorable environment, but to those whom he loves, he tries to provide the necessary comfort, showing attention and care. Proud of their success and achieves a high estimate of his personality. Has a tendency to overestimate their own merits, which leads to arrogance and the desire to teach others. Self-confidence and lack of self-criticism did not facilitate his relationship with others. Respects people influential and respected. Forgiving of flexible, soft and defenseless, in need of assistance, especially to children. Often they provide protection and support. However, strict, even harsh at home and at work. Very stubborn and demanding. In personal relationships difficult to adapt to the partner, as a fairly uncompromising. Effort of will can make sense of a subordinate to reason, proud and independent. It is often unpredictable in their actions, depends on the variability of mood. Pretty unstable in hobbies, but his affection tries to keep a long time. Values ??of the old friendship, although sentiment in the relationship usually does not show. Strives for a high material standard of living. He has a good aesthetic taste, gourmet, can not deny myself that gives him pleasure. Durst in sex, but suspicious of love, afraid to be deceived in their hopes, wishful thinking. Quickly get tired of the monotony: he impresses psychological game with a partner, when hope is replaced by doubt - this is an element of excitement." ![]() 2019-06-26 02:23:48pm (post #6516) |
phsc ![]() though i dont think anyone didnt know about that Anyway I kind of agree with INTP since I took a function magic test in real life and scored INTP! All tests always give me the same 4 functions and what changes is the order, it tends to be Ti or Te first then Ni or Ne after, but sometimes Ne is quite low compared to the other two, or Ti = Te = Ni > Ne or whatever, which would be INTJ, but then since we don't have specific sources or whatever and we are like "supposed" to follow IDR labs or were supposed to or whatever I think their INTP description fits me better than the INTJ or the INFJ I mean let me just shut up and take this! https://www.idrlabs.com/test/intj-or-intp.php one of their amazing tests! just not as amazing as the Pooh test! That was close, though there have been questions where I would mark both options. This actually opens up the oportunity of a recommendation I might make to strawberry crisis which is: make function votes source-dependant, like let's say I really like Beebe, then I do a Beebe vote, lets say that someone likes Jung, then someone does a vote for jungian functions, but then there is also someone who likes CS Joseph or tumblr function stuff or whatever, that person votes with CS Joseph or maybe a category called other, and in theory this could allow for multiple function votes and make it less... magical I guess? ![]() 2019-06-15 11:37:20pm (post #6428) |
Diobono int 5w4 ili![]() ![]() 2019-06-15 06:04:23am (post #6423) |
phsc ![]() its because there was an anonymous INTP IDR vote that i didnt see removed until you made your vote thus i assume you made it but am genuinely curious as to why and its not like it makes any difference ![]() 2019-06-15 12:41:22am (post #6422) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-06-11 05:55:38pm (post #6398) |
jt ISFJ 1 <3 fg <3 fg ![]() https://sites.math.washington.edu/~m124/source/Exams/Final/final_18aut/124finalAut18_ans.pdf ![]() 2019-06-11 02:38:50pm (post #6396) |
phsc ![]() also according to cena im not josephty yet doha ![]() 2019-06-11 12:16:57pm (post #6381) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-06-11 01:44:05am (post #6368) |
jt ISFJ 1 <3 fg <3 fg ![]() ![]() 2019-06-11 01:37:35am (post #6367) |
jt ISFJ 1 <3 fg <3 fg ![]() https://web.archive.org/web/20160505033939im_/https://i.imgur.com/EljxwSy.png ![]() 2019-06-11 01:29:17am (post #6365) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-06-11 12:16:49am (post #6363) |
jt ISFJ 1 <3 fg <3 fg ![]() A water trough is 12 meters long with a semi-circular cross section of radius 0.8 meters. The trough and its cross section are shown below. The pictures are not to scale. The trough is being filled at a rate of 0.3 cubic meters per minute. At what rate is the angle θ shown changing when it is 2π/3 radians? Give an exact answer with units https://sites.math.washington.edu/~m124/source/Exams/Final/final_18aut/124finalAut18.pdf ![]() 2019-06-10 03:16:30pm (post #6359) |
phsc ![]() its amazing that if i try to discredit someone trying to vote me with only website information i will fall in contradiction cuz i did exactly that with tman but ok ![]() 2019-06-01 12:29:15pm (post #6237) |
phsc ![]() it is extremely easy to edit results on their tests so lets take the game of thrones test thing https://www.idrlabs.com/graphic/game-of-thrones?p=50,50,50,50,50,50,50&l=EN if you mark middle for everything what happens is that you can edit the values out of the result by opening the image and getting that, like so with the URL you can just change stuff https://www.idrlabs.com/graphic/game-of-thrones?p=100,0,100,100,0,0,0&l=EN etc, if you want to make it realistic just swap the URL of the image via inspect element and add the edited test or just edit it there and screenshot as clearly everybody knows IDRlabs are extremely accurate with everything actually many tests are like that, some even in the result URL itself ![]() 2019-05-19 04:12:07pm (post #5997) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-05-19 03:45:07pm (post #5996) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-05-19 03:43:48pm (post #5995) |
phsc ![]() are you happy now mr teru ![]() 2019-05-19 02:52:44pm (post #5992) |
Taco110 Ni-Se you'll see ST![]() ![]() 2019-05-18 11:45:22pm (post #5970) |
phsc ![]() https://www.buzzfeed.com/pedrofequiere/everyone-has-a-penis-that-matches-their-personality anyway have a random autism test result too, wait, am i breaking rules ![]() 2019-05-18 11:38:44pm (post #5969) |
![]() 2019-05-18 11:29:39pm (post #5968) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-05-18 11:25:33pm (post #5967) |
phsc ![]() that Fe... anyway have some indie rock! Just going to post the tests here for those curious, also I find it extremely sad that I made the last 4 and now 5 comments in my poll, amazing. https://www.idrlabs.com/cognitive-function/test.php http://www.keys2cognition.com/explore.htm https://similarminds.com/ https://jung.test.typologycentral.com/ i was going to post the crystal ball emooji but i found out discord uses svg files ![]() 2019-05-18 07:41:30pm (post #5966) |
phsc ![]() NVM DOESNT WORK ![]() 2019-05-12 06:36:36pm (post #5934) |
phsc ![]() since deleting doesnt work anymore this will stay here even though this test involves time and if my hypothesis fails i won't be able to delete it ![]() 2019-05-12 05:00:27pm (post #5932) |
phsc ![]() does this work tho oh at least that does though liking and deleting comments dont work but ok ![]() 2019-05-08 08:17:33pm (post #5891) |
phsc ![]() i voted inTj (it was i-n-T-j but ok) the vote did not appeared as full T automatically. (the vote did not appear as full T automatically? what is this trying to say? what is automatic? how is this even automatic?) i added one - between T and J that was not here before (before what? this was your first vote on me so it is not that, before the T? but then you did put one betwen T and j?) it put it as full (there is nothing full so IT did not put it maybe YOU DID and that would be I but if I got it right you're saying you put a full T vote and the - before it was a mistake) ![]() 2019-04-30 08:44:56pm (post #5849) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST![]() ![]() 2019-04-30 02:53:39pm (post #5847) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST![]() ![]() 2019-04-30 02:51:45pm (post #5846) |
tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sp/Sx ILI![]() 2019-04-20 02:52:13pm (post #5803) |
phsc ![]() I find the chances of someone reading this are quite low and the same for it not being ignored because of future votes that make this go out of the frontpage and without the latest comments as a specific thing which is the biggest problem I currently have with the website, but well maybe someone does read it, I mean I did do that extremely big analysis over functions and I actually was quite fact-oriented with it and empirical one could say too which can kill the point I make on N vs S but it is a more specific thing as this implies a posteriori and empiricism. For N vs S, I am unsure about where to get a good source but there are a few things that makes me think I am higher on N than I might give the impression of, first of all I don't really care about facts, or reality at all, I do not like historicism, and I am not realy someone who is action oriented, I mean most of what I plan on doing isn't physical at all, I plan on working with programming and actually already formally study it, and all of it does not really exist, I do not really care for hardware though and don't really have interest in learning related topics, I do not care for facts as they can be easily manipulated into anything one wants, as well as many false correlations can be achieved out of them, this can kinda be weird considering Te should be a function of mine for those who care about it, I am unsure if is the knowledge I've consumed yet not discovered that makes me think like that though, well theres this website n etc http://tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations and of course logic comes before facts as well as the understanding of them, I am not really pragmatical, physical or anything, I do not do much actually, and I do a lot of useless stuff I find interesting and this has been since I was a kid, a good example is my interest in philosophy, my favourite philosopher is that is even a thing is by far Kant, though there are a lot of things I've not learned about and did not read. I really like films such as Donnie Darko, Apocalypse Now, 2001, Fight Club, all pretty generic mostly considering people who are here but sensors tend not to be so attracted to these movies as I've seen, I also have problems with executing stuff, I take too much for me to handle sometimes, and I keep imagining what might happen instead of what is, all generic stuff, but I am pretty detail oriented which is a more S thing I think, and I can - on a specific moment - have pretty good physical skills as in observing, while I am more creative over that, I could show examples but it would be too big, I am also attracted to more interesting forms of art, I do enjoy realistic pieces but it is not that much about what they represent yet the virtuosity of them, on music I enjoy some pretty weird things, Schoenberg, Stravinski, Stockhausen, not as much as I enjoy Bach, Beethoven or Chopin but I still enjoy them in a quite different way and it is more of a N thing I think, as well as really enjoying learning music theory for itself and many times not for practical use, as well as many other things I do, I am unsure about the 0.25N votes being accurate and what people were thinking about when making them, maybe the high use of tests and similar things indicating I am more of a sensor or something, I think 0.75 would be the perfect vote aka -N. For T vs F, I am clearly T, I am unsure about how one achieves feeling, I actually have a few reasons I imagine but they heavily assume things about people and not about my behaviour, I am a pretty logical person I would say in a general way, I enjoy thinking in a general way, I am more into reading things made by Ti users and think it as more interesting, as well as most of my friends are and I try to explain things using it, I do not have that much empathy, I am really socially awkward and do not know how to react to feelings by others many times, I've never felt love and I'm dying a virgin pretty much but not a problem though I am still really young so who knows what will happen, I mean all the generic T things, at most one could say I do not seek conflict but that is just here actually, in real life I am not as chill as I might look here, quite an asshole actually and that is why I vote cp5w6 but the reason why depends on a thing I did last week which is quite long so I won't mention it at least yet. For J vs P, this is quite tough, I really plan, that is something that people even criticize me for, I do not like changes in my plans, I do not like not having information and people who constantly change their minds on what they are going to do or do not plan at all such as my dad, I do not go far as making lists though I save almost everything I find important or interesting, I am organized in a general way and don't do a lot of heavy P things other than the way I write which is not planned and many times I do not verify things again which is weird, and I also procrastinate more than doing things earlier, though when I want to do a thing I get to it really quickly, it is more about responsabilities and I always finish what I start even if I am not going to use it or publish it, though I always try to stay open minded but many times something could've just been planned, I am not that good of a decision maker because I fear lacking information or making a mistake which is a general anxiety which I do have in a general way in correlation with everything but it is all correlated with the core fears of all of my types, mostly 5 which should be lacking information or not understanding things, there is no preference over planning things I do for joy or just doing them out of nowhere, it is mostly a mix betwen both methods of approach, I do not appear to be relaxed though, I think 0.5J because of some big P traits being present on me, another thing is being more oriented to the internal world and organizing it over the external even though I organize both. And thus I achieve 0.5I, 0.75N, 1T and 0.5J, I am quite curious towards why two people did not vote 1T for me and really wish to understand that other than work on the assumption I have on my mind, also going to post a few test results just to mention a few things that changed over older results, also do not take these tests as absolute results n etc pretty obvious stuff I can be biased I can be stupid the tests can be bad etc. ALSO STRAWBERRY CRISIS CAN YOU PLEASE ADD A WORKING SPOILER FUNCTION FOR IMAGES AND ALSO THE IMAGE THING DOES NOT WORK IT DOES NOT UPDATE THE FIELDS FOR SOME REASON That test was terrible by the way, fg got 8w7 and 6 and 4 if we consider a tritype which is much different from what is voted here, that being from the discord. I think that test is also bad, I always get 5w4 when I take it over 5w6 with a minimal different and a quite high score for 3 compared to many other tests, being also P and much more N than normal. Results still fit with older test results I've posted so I guess that is nice? I took that to give feedback to strawberry crisis but it seems like it did not work or strawberry crisis ignores people that post pastebin links into the minuscule feedback box, but on that test I either get ENTJ, INTJ or INTP and I get a really small score for Ni on it compared to lets say Dario Nardi's test or any other generic test. And finally the Big5 stuff: Unsure about how spammy this is, and unsure about why I spend my time doing something that nobody is going to read. ![]() 2019-04-18 06:18:36pm (post #5797) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-04-15 06:20:11pm (post #5794) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-03-30 07:03:04am (post #5746) |
Reddit isfj Show me the gold ![]() ![]() 2019-03-30 06:32:52am (post #5745) |
phsc ![]() That is if you're directing it to me instead of someone else on this amazing page but then I have no idea of who that could be. But the josepthy1 thing makes some sense, random dude appears out of nowhere and finds many flaws on the website, with some typology knowledge, I would think that could be a possibility considering how few new people enter this website, I am not him and I think anyone that has talked to me on discord would agree but then I don't even know how his behaviour was so... But let me also make a question, how are you deducing your 0.75T vote for me? so the method that I use is that a 1T vote means 8 out of 8 actions are done by thinking, that a 0.25T is 5 by thinking, a 0.25F is 3 by thinking, then when there are many actions I just round it, just to be sure I will mention that I did not get angry at all on any of this and most of it was just me ridicularizing things, just curious to know your line of thinking in achieving it because I cannot and thus am curious, maybe it can be just that I might have acted out of feelings or something similar and do not remember or just did not realize that I did. ![]() 2019-03-29 10:27:50pm (post #5742) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST![]() ![]() 2019-03-29 06:10:39pm (post #5739) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-03-29 06:07:41pm (post #5738) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() alright so now joseph is being persecuted by the government, can i ask who Reddit is ![]() 2019-03-29 12:51:16pm (post #5737) |
phsc ![]() but you know, giving a reaction to a troll is clearly not what he wants! ![]() 2019-03-29 06:41:30am (post #5736) |
phsc ![]() Old result and then the new result I took the test again because I think the specific questions that were randomized for me were really making it so the specific 4 and the specific 6 questions were ones that are accurate for me, and I was indeed right. When I took the first test, most of the 4 questions were related to art and similar concepts, many being correlated to artistic skill or just being interested in that, while the ones for 6 were about following authority figures, ideologies and common sense. The second one was more balanced, having some questions I remember seeing in the first but some correlated with wanting to different, special or having a identity for 4 and safety, routine and paranoia for 6, which are the things that fit me the most, of course I've shown much more 6 behaviour and well bloomer even thinks I am a 6 so I guess that could be proof that the test is not accurate which is to expected but for such a long test that is supposed to be great there were flaws which is how the questions are selected, also I remember in the first test I got the same question twice, I already talked to strawberry crisis about this. A problem with the second test is pretty obvious, sx/so/sp while all my results are sp/so/sx other than 5, 7 and 8, also the higher score on 8 was interesting, as the -9 points for 5. In the second one maybe I could be biased towards voting more for 6 questions but these were the ones I did think the most about when taking it so that would not happen also trying to think about past actions that are related. hey strawberry crisis the spoiler function does not work! ![]() 2019-03-27 09:57:19pm (post #5729) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-03-27 08:27:18am (post #5719) |
phsc ![]() >finds flaws in the website which you very likely can't and wouldn't be able to find if you had the knowledge >the dude who said that to me is Jacobus >Dostoevski as IEI, Wittgenstein as LSI, Rei as INFJ(IDR), Asuka as 2w3, Jesus as EIE, Schoenberg as INFJ and 4w5. >tfw half of his votes are INFJ 4w5 EIE >dumb fuck ![]() 2019-03-26 05:45:39pm (post #5714) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2019-03-26 04:27:47pm (post #5713) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-03-26 04:23:34pm (post #5712) |
phsc ![]() But I actually don't think many people get here by googling it, and even then it is the 4th result for "jung function test" and no way sakinorva is getting more popular than IDRlabs, typologycentral and similarminds so there should be no problem. But that is literally censorship we must start a revolution agaisn't abusive admins. Also I love how my n word votes for you weren't. ![]() 2019-03-25 03:40:13pm (post #5705) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-03-25 03:35:57pm (post #5703) |
phsc ![]() test STRAWBERRY CRISIS THE COMMENT EDIT FEATURE HTML VERIFICATION VIA PHP TO REMOVE TAGS DOESN'T WORK by the way fix the russian themed sakinorva page and use it it is indeed amazing ![]() 2019-03-25 03:28:28pm (post #5702) |
phsc ![]() The only thing more amazing than tests are intellectual figures I can suck the dick of, like OH MY GOD someone smart said something so it must be right! I love authority and following what others say, you know? I mean the state is so outdated, I think like Bakunin is way cooler, he has way more style, he also seems smarter than most statists. But there is one thing I prefer over all of that, religion, oh yes, eternal hope and safety, since I am a 6 and actually I lied, I am also ESFJ and my tritype(I'm mentioning it because you don't like it) is 279, since you don't believe in it you cannot type me as 6 on it but like if strawberry crisis is a 6 then I must be a 6, but back to religion, I am really religious, like, uh, yeah, love it. Now my bloomer god, since the mistery has been solved and I am indeed the ultimate 6w5, and I mentioned tritype, you should act like you did in the past, ok? ![]() 2019-03-22 05:20:29pm (post #5668) |
bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE![]() ![]() 2019-03-22 05:11:59pm (post #5667) |
phsc ![]() Even then, according to your own words: >Type 6 seeks security, guidance and support >State is security, guidance and support I truly cannot take you seriously anymore ![]() 2019-03-22 04:40:40pm (post #5666) |
bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE![]() ![]() 2019-03-22 04:05:12pm (post #5665) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-03-22 04:00:16pm (post #5664) |
bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE![]() ![]() 2019-03-22 03:59:07pm (post #5663) |
bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE![]() ![]() 2019-03-22 03:54:18pm (post #5662) |
phsc ![]() I am indeed projecting and scapegoating! oh noes! a dude appears out of nowhere in an underground website and starts to act in really similar way to multiple individuals that have been here! and knowing that people did have osme paranoia over me when I joined here I clearly wouldn't expect what they imagine could happen to actually happen! and clearly, you do not have alts and would never make one, as clearly you did not like your own comments, which is actually a plain sad thing from my point of view, and I did not ask strawberry crisis about poll creation being made by you but I find it very interesting that, some crappy polls used to be made when you were active. This is going nowhere, ok you win I am a 6 ok? arguments and logic? pff, ignore all that, the fact that a fear and a motive can maybe create really common behaviour for an individual and people with similar fears and motives can... have similar behaviour? and the fact we can correlate it to things such as the MBTI, socionics, Jungian functions, Big5 and actually... see that if someone is an SLE it is very likely that person is an 8 because it just makes sense for these two to go together, but not using it as the main argument yet for the basic hint for what to look for. Now keep ignoring the vast majority of what I write and focus on specific things because that is what you're trying to achieve, but remember, I am 6, ok? I give up! I won't change my vote because uuuh let me think for a bad reason I mean uuuuh I like the number 5 ok? ![]() 2019-03-22 03:54:03pm (post #5661) |
bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE![]() ![]() 2019-03-22 03:44:33pm (post #5660) |
bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE![]() ![]() 2019-03-22 03:42:54pm (post #5659) |
phsc ![]() First of all, it LOOKS LIKE I take influence from tests because THAT IS WHAT I POST HERE, if I truly followed tests I wouldn't give myself a 0.25 J vote yet something higher but I am not the biggest J on letters, but that is just an example, if I followed tests I wouldn't be considering LII so much for sociotype yet ILE and instead of LIE maybe even ILI because of the test results I've posted, but I did go trough and read about the types and LII fits, using J characteristics I am slighty more J than P if not neutral and 5w6 is over 6w5. As you said I look like an admin, you look like some really close minded individual, after the "discussion" if even that we had into that post about indigo child I think I really do not think I should take you seriously but for some reason I enjoy replying to people in any case, and you're also blindly assuming my opinion on enneagram 6 intuitives, I in the past probably mistyped some people I find really, what would be the world, badass? such as Spinoza as 6s, well now I see I was wrong, and it is not bias agaisn't 6 or something. BUT EVEN THEN, even if it is, I always verify what I do, and as 6 as it may sound it is mostly assuming I have bias so I talk to people and indirectly or even directly ask their opinions on me and behaviour to check how well it fits, and I won't lie, 5 is way over 6, and I do use the core fears and the motives more in that kind of thing, as I also did for socionics functions on the big analysis I made you just ignored because you know I blindly follow tests right? another proof you're not serious yet just trolling. And the only two people I've seen you type as people from the community were me and strawberry crisis, both cases for 6 and both cases it looks like just to make us angry or something but not sure if you realized, it does not work, I find it even funny sometimes. But you're going to ignore the part that goes agaisn't your beliefs as you always do and try to throw some terrible arguments for 6 because that is all you can do, and why I think you're a troll, but for real, I'm such a 6, I am in favor of ideas such as libertarianism because you know, I want the state to protect me and some politicians to trust because I am a 6! ![]() 2019-03-22 03:31:59pm (post #5658) |
bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE![]() ![]() 2019-03-22 03:18:41pm (post #5657) |
bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE![]() I'm only a troll because i'm not saying you're a 5 like you want. Judging by your opinion on enneagram 6 intuitives, i'm not surprised that there is hestitation to identify as such. ![]() 2019-03-22 02:56:26pm (post #5656) |
phsc ![]() It just happens that I am more 6, on the security part and the paranoia thing, than 4, because I really don't care about my identity and I would like to be unique but not for the reasons a 4 would, it is more like people will remember who I am and I mean supply and demand, if I am different and maybe this different is a positive different I could use that for like useful things in my life or something? like in a job interview or something, being different from others but in a positive way for a useful reason. Also can you please stop repeating the same thing always? I am pretty sure I am a 5w6, with a tritype of 513, not perfectly because who knows, what I am unsure about is my socionics type, and by the way I really cannot see you being LIE, the way you act with the enneagram which is the thing you use the most is more socio Ti than Te even and the fact you keep or at least kept creating alts could be considered more of a Se thing, but it is mostly lack of socio Ni. But I still think you're an troll or just an alt so meh, and I love how hypocritical you are sometimes. >Don't use behaviour. >YOU'RE ALL SIXES BECAUSE YOU'RE PARANOID ABOUT SOME RANDOM UNDERGROUND TYPOLOGY WEBSITE STUFF! ![]() 2019-03-22 12:11:38pm (post #5655) |
bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE![]() ![]() 2019-03-22 12:19:46am (post #5654) |
bioomer2 ENTJ 3w4 LIE![]() ![]() 2019-03-22 12:15:13am (post #5653) |
phsc ![]() I still identify with 6 more than 4 but I think like the fact I compose and am interested in art in a general way affected the results in the art oriented questions a lot even though I like things I assume 5w6s in history have liked in art such as counterpoint in music, but I MEAN I AM A 6W5 BIOOMER SAYS SOMETHING IT MEANS ITS TRUE OK? or maybe just cp things? I mean it is indeed a test so there can be bias, me just not knowing who I actually am or something, etc. The 10 points for 8 on social are interesting though. ![]() 2019-03-21 03:34:56pm (post #5650) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-03-12 03:18:27pm (post #5565) |
phsc ![]() So I wrote a lot more text but now it is all gone and I didn't save it but anyway I got 34.3e vs 75i, 19.8e 89i, and a fucking 2e and 32i on sakinorva tests I posted. Also isn't the fact I get literally all votes I do based on my personal experience socially being wrong indicate that I suck socially or don't know much people or know the wrong ones or just am unlucky or am actually right a signal that I am more introverted? this is the worst argument I've made in my entire life. But I went to look for older 16personalities test I took, I mean uuuh I did all of them in the time the website was offline because I am an introvert and what you say matters to me. So I use discord as like a database even though they steal my information but does not matter for this kind of stuff, and older than 3-4 months was in a older server that I deleted for some reason but anyway here are some older test results, or I could be faking them right now in the period the website was off and I mean I could inspect element the text via the browser discord for the date thing but meh. Link in the screenshot, from results, so lightshot works like it stores it and you can see the date of a image in the link. https://prnt.sc/lbffjr They are on m as the main letter now, so I guess it is a proof it is at least a little bit old, it can be further but I jsut changed the l to m. Well I saw your ENTJ IDR vote before the website went out, and sakinorva really enjoys giving it to me, I also got INTP like twice but I cannot find the results but really back then I got like one INTJ result I also cannot find! Even then this is tests I can be biased it is all pretty old people change I guess etc etc I literally have two friends and am going to die alone as a virgin and the saddest part is that I have no problems with that etc my mom thinks I'm the most introverted person ever but then she is a ESFJ 2w3 and fun fact, I literally have never been to party and I don't like initiating on people at all actually I hate it but ok. Now a what I imagined would be a bunch of sakinorva function test results that are supposed to be old or something that give ENTJ! Also unsure if strawberry crisis changed a few of the questions since then but ok. I don't see myself as an extrovert but then it is just a vote and your opinion. ![]() 2019-03-12 02:08:43pm (post #5564) |
phsc ![]() But why cannot one want to be labeled? some people enjoy that, what is the problem? just because you don't think it is healthy for them? what if health is not what said person values? etc. Also there is another problem, what is broad? lets say I know 3 things, you know 30, if one of these things applies to the other two for me while for you it is a completely separate one, wouldn't that thing be really important for me? not like it is but your "argument" is not really valid. Also one can be a levelheaded and analytical figure over things that are unimportant and superfluos on your view, can't them? like I am an atheist and a lot of people think about god and achieve some conclusions, in my point of view it is all useless but I understand that for them it can be important, I think you got what I am trying to say. But then subjectivity also falls into a problem which is, what if one simply decides reason is not the right thing and etc it is pretty obvious past this point. This might be getting to r/im14andthisisdeep with a mix of r/iamverysmart so I guess I will end it here but ok so considering you very likely did read at least a little bit of that, considering everything, what do you think? LII? LIE? ILE? LSI? Also just a small observation, so I like listening to classical music, and well, symphonies are long and sometimes I do not just want to sit for an hour listening to them, mostly if it is one I have listened to before, so I do something relatively simple while listening to one for the sake of it, and that comment was one of these, as some "typing" sessions I do on the website because I do enjoy the activity, etc, is that unimportant from your point of view? ![]() 2019-03-04 09:53:56pm (post #5520) |
ResoluteSoul INFJ 1w2 145 Destination? The stars. ![]() ![]() 2019-03-04 09:27:11pm (post #5518) |
phsc ![]() I have arguments for all of that up but I am not going to post a ton of text I wrote in the past and could write as arguments for these typings, I am open minded to changes but I find it very unlikely one is going to find out I am a different type for said things. Into Socionics, I am going to try to show proof according to my behavior in the website for LII and LIE, considering maybe a small analysis of why people voted what they did, then using real life behavior, then using many other typing methods, then based on some experiments I did related to it, and then achieving a final conclusion, or trying to at least. 1 : Website On this website, I have not been heavily analytical or anything like that, which would be more of a Ti trait, and not that much argumentative, and when argumentative I have been more empiric than logical, also most of the times I fucked up it was related to INFPs which is something I find interesting, and well, if I got socionics right, Te is a function way more correlated to empiricism , as LIE, when compared to LII, being the types I would consider myself as and votes also have considered, other than that I tend to assume a lot of stuff, which is if I am right socio Ne, mostly as I always try to mention that I am assuming things that indicate Ti use I would say, other functions not very shown, I guess Si since I want to maintain the website in peace and using Ne and not sure if Te or Ti to find errors in the website that can be abused, unsure about Fi and Fe use – all I know is that I am really socially awkward here I think – I do not remember showing any kind of Se and Ni, keep in mind if my definitions are wrong just tell me about it, but according to what I’ve seen commented on typings, assumed on the logic behind votes made by others and such things, I think they are right, also I did read that post by fg where he compares socionics functions with Jungian ones, and did of course read material related to it. Going deeper into it, it is obvious a Fx is what I consider my worst function and thus deducing it as my role function, not sure if Fe but later on I will explain that better. Unsure about other functions and how I might have showed them here, Ne and Te being the ones I personally think I have shown the most but it does not fit the Model A as in theory one should be in the Id and one should be in the Ego, if that is what you guys use but I am also unsure. On the votes, I will start from bottom to top: Me: I consider myself LII by many reasons and I will explain them later. Phantom: I guess the fact that my socio Fe sucks, that I fit the ExxJ temperament according to my behavior here, maybe Te since I prepared things for others to type me? Unsure. Teru: Of course could be trolling, I did show way more Te use and lack of knowing that empiricism is highly subjective and I also showed myself as more of a P and in theory LIIs are really rational and in socionics that would mean J for MBTI if I got it right, again maybe the same thing for my crappy Fe, etc. NiTech: So I am going to divide this in three cases: 1 – He thinks I am a Ti Ne user, reasons I explained before diving into specific typings. 2 – He is GalaxyStrider, who is someone that went to talk to me on Discord, and if I remember right had sociotype as LII-Ti, Jungian type as INTJ and enneagram as 5wi don’t remember, 1w9 and don’t remember the other one, which seems to fit, considering my behavior in his discord I would also imagine I am a LII since I literally joined, talked to him for a few minutes, he mentioned a test, I took it, didn’t post results, didn’t say a word, left it, then a while ago posted said test results here, unsure about the low rating on I since that would be a thing that indicates more I behavior but again I am assuming he is said person and this is a pure guess and I can be completely wrong, there is also a thing I’ve seen that is people in older comments mentioning the name GalaxyStrider so maybe that is an account but I did go through all accounts considering ID for the website and do not remember finding it but I did go considerably quick. On it, GalaxyStrider does not have, at least currently, an account on the website, but I see that there were likes by him, which is interesting, also there was some kind of discussion between Teru and kawaii that he was mentioned but here is the thing, I have no fucking idea and this is a pure guess. 3 – Maybe he just saw I consider myself LII and voted LII, this seems to be a thing, as well as people voting for types that have been voted by people they trust but then I assume they are not doing some effort to understand the thinking behind other votes. The cp5w6 is the best part of this, I do not consider myself a cp5w6, just a generic 5w6 but that was more of a test to see if people would vote cp5w6 for me if I considered myself a cp5w6, which happened and I do not blame NiTech for it, I would very likely do the same and maybe after all I can be a cp5w6, ResoluteSoul really likes voting cp for people though. 2 : Real life and other methods: You guys could assume some things about my life, first of all that I know programming or at least website-related programming since I was able to find flaws on this, I do know actual programming and plan on working in that area for the rest of my life unless it dies for some reason which I find a unlikely thing to happen. Other than that, maybe aspergers but then it is just Jacobus mentioning it but kawaii when he went on private chat via GalaxyStrider’s discord to talk to me mentioned he also considered it a thing, maybe it can be some bias because of that theory I could be josepthy1. Anyway I am a 16 year old who happens to be a enneagram 5 and then likes learning a bunch of crap and most of it has no use(this is also a thing against Te, most in the case of LIE, according to what I know, is related to learning useful things), I do not have many friends, I mean in real life I would consider one but even then not that much, online a considerable amount, still not super personal with anyone, I like learning things as I mentioned, I like many and many areas and that is kind of a problem, I want to live alone, I am very likely going to die a virgin and have no problems with that but wouldn’t consider myself asexual but also not an incel, also I have a theory for my own post jungian system but it is underdeveloped and I need a lot of information and things and I don't want to give information about it, at least yet. By functions, I personally consider myself a Ti Ne user as main functions, reading type descriptions by Gulenko and the one by V. Megend and A. Ovcharov I also think I fit pretty well into LII-Ti, at most there are problems, the Model A mentions the Id functions as boring and meaningless, and me not finding much meaning in them, but I do not think they are boring and yeah the skill thing seems to make sense and fit. The biggest problem I have with LII is Se, I would say my Se is quite decent, I do not lack confidence in it, nor am sensitive to criticism, I find it boring and useless. I consider me as having higher Fi than Fe, which also fits LIE more if I got things right. But I am more long-term oriented on my thinking and this would indicate Ni use. There are other methods of typing, so let me get into it: Quadras: I am for sure an Alpha, learning a bunch of useless stuff for the sake of it is a alpha thing, I like discussing theoretical and not practical at all concepts for joy, that is one of the reasons I read philosophy and economy on my free time, not because I am going to be a philosopher or an economist, but because I enjoy it, also the philosophers I like the most are Descartes and Kant and if I got it right, alphas like things that makes sense. Other than that, I would consider most of the people I talk to and enjoy talking to as alphas, I will explain that later. Also, on values, I am clearly democratic, I defend the free market in a general way but the actual free market, without corporatism which is the biggest problem related to it, won’t go deeper at least now. Other than that, beta really not, delta? Nope, gamma? I mentioned I am more long-term oriented after all, but then I do not enjoy talking about useful things unless it is important. Temperaments: I consider myself a IxxJ, with some ExxJ traits, I am in a general way really calm, I can get angry over minimal things sometimes but maybe it is aspergers which I am unsure if I actually do have or not and I am going to an actual psychiatrist in a very close future, but even then it is not something that changes my thinking or makes me impulsive and it does not last long. ExxJ could be a thing, if I am deep into something I am kinda restless, I have a lot of problems with sleeping and a thing I saw is that ExxJs fidget while IxxJs don’t, in my case it really depends, but I would say more of a yes than a no, but I’m not sure how accurate this is, as I am also not sure about how accurate the movement thing is, as I would fit more of an IxxJ style of movement than a ExxJ. Dichotomies: There are three test results that consider these, or two, actually I don’t remember but am not going to look, that have results for dichotomies, but I do not consider it that accurate. I consider myself more introverted than extroverted, mostly in real life, unsure if I have social anxiety or something, more intuitive than sensing of course, but not extremely, logical for fucking sure, irrational and rational are an interesting thing, I am not really sure where I fit the best but would consider slighty more rational, constructivist slightly, negativist and positivist neutral, democratic for sure, merry and serious balanced, asking way more, slightly more strategic, obstinate also, result and process neutral, static considerably high amount. Anyway I found this random Russian test that uses dichotomies so I decided I would take it considering what I would put for me to see where I end up. http://socionics.org/test/reinincalc.asp?advanced=1#@form Also fits with INTj LII. 3 : What if I am completely biased for being INTj LII-Ti? Well, I did consider this possibility, and maybe I still am or something, but here is what I decided I would do: ask people that know me well information related to that. And by people that know me well, I considered both from real life, internet, people that are close or not that close to me, etc. I ended up doing it with 10 people, I took a definition of functions from sociotype.com on the page Information Elements that has a small description of them, changed them from Ti Ne Fi Se to 1 2 3 4 so there would be no bias because maybe someone saw me mentioning Jungian functions at a specific moment, even though I think one person was biased. So, who are the people? I will not give names because I do not know if they would like it, or even allow it and I did not ask them. H: Ixtp ISTP SLI-Si 9w8 973 sx/sp - 7 m Z: eNtP INTP ILE-Ne 9w1 954 sp/so - 6 y T: ISTJ ISTJ SLI-Si 9w1 935 sp/so - 6 y A: INFP INFP SLI-Si 4w3 495 sp/sx 6 m D: InxJ ISFJ LII-Ti 9w1 952 sp/so - 1 y D2: INFx SEI-Si 9w1 964 sp/sx - 6 m Z2: ENtP LSE-Si 7w8 729 so/sx - 5 m J: INTP INTP ILE-Ti 5w4 592 sp/sx - 7 m - biased K: iSfj ISFJ SEI-Si 9w1 962 sp/so - 6 y G: INtp ISTJ ILI-Te 5w4 549 sp/so - 5 m I would say it matters because not only the conversation topics and style changes between the people I talk to, but also how they view me. So the categorization means, I being >50% for I, I being 1 to 50%, same for N, T and J, then their sociotype and I like to make it specific, then the enneagram, the tritype according to this websites format and then the variant, followed by the amount of time I’ve known them, m being months and y being years. I think J who is someone I mentioned Jung to a lot, just followed more of his definitions and my test results and what I consider myself as from a Jungian view in, which is INTJ, I will still consider his opinion though. So what were their votes? H: Te > Ti > Se > Ne > Ni > Fi > Si > Fe (7>1>4>2>8>3>6>5) - ExxJ Z: Te > Se > Ni > Ne > Ti > Fi > Si > Fe (7>4>8>2>1>3>6>5) - ExxJ T: Ti > Te > Se > Ni > Ne > Si > Fe > Fi (1>7>4>8>2>6>5>3) - IxxJ A: Ti > Ne > Se > Te > Fe > Ni > Si > Fi (1>2>4>7>5>8>6>3) - ExxJ D: Ti > Te > Ni > Se > Si > Ne > Fi > Fe (1>7>8>4>6>2>3>5) - IxxJ D2: Ti > Te > Se > Ni > Ne > Fi > Fe > Si (1>7>4>8>2>3>5>6) - ExxJ Z2: Te > Ti > Se > Ne > Ni > Si > Fi > Fe (7>1>4>2>8>6>3>5) - IxxJ J: Ni > Te > Se > Ne > Ti > Si > Fi > Fe (8>7>4>2>1>6>3>5) - ExxJ - biased K: Ti > Se > Fi > Te > Ne > Ni > Fe > Si (1>4>3>7>2>8>5>6) - ExxJ G: Ti > Se > Ni > Ne > Te > Si > Fe > Fi (1>4>8>2>7>6>5>3) – ExxJ 1: Ti(6) Te(3) Ni(1) 2: Ti(2) Te(4) Ne(1) Se(3) 3: Se(6) Ni(3) Fi(1) 4: Te(2) Ni(5) Ne(2) Se(1) 5: Ti(2) Te(1) Ni(2) Ne(3) Si(1) Fe(1) 6: Ni(2) Ne(1) Si(4) Fi(3) 7: Si(3) Fi(3) Fe(4) 8: Si(2) Fi(3) Fe(5) The most basic form of interpreting that results would be that I am a LSI, which is interesting, I will go back to it later. If we formulate the data in another way, as 1 = x 8 and 8 = x 1: Ti: 48 + 14 + 8 = 70 Te: 24 + 28 + 10 + 4 = 66 Ni: 8 + 18 + 25 + 8 + 6 = 65 Ne: 7 + 25 + 12 + 3 = 47 Si: 4 + 12 + 6 + 4 = 26 Se: 21 + 36 + 5 = 62 Fi: 6 + 9 + 6 + 3 = 24 Fe: 4 + 8 + 5 = 17 Which makes it so: Ti(70)>Te(66)>Ni(65)>Se(62)>Ne(47)>Si(26)>Fi(24)>Fe(17) I think I should’ve made it so the 5th 6th 7th 8th functions in peoples list should give negative score until *-4 but I will make so it goes like that after I talk about the current results. And well, interesting, Ti dom? Unsure, Te Ni are both really high and close and that would be LIE and if I got things right this I am doing exactly right now is Te use not Ti even though I think I did Ti use earlier in this analysis, I’d say Ne was really low for LII. So I think LIE, LII and LSI are choices? I personally would not put LSI into it but I did consider it for the part after the next part. Considering how Model A goes, unsure, Fi and Si higher than Fe, Si would be the POLR for LIE if I am right and I would say that is not true, I mean I do care about minor details many times, and well sometimes I do not care about my surroundings or comfort, but in a general way I do, and I care and am worse with Fe or Fi way more, but then, the POLR for LII is Se which was something I got a quite high value in, and well I do end up being a leader in many situations, I am bad at making people want me to be one and achieving that but I am not bad at being a leader itself, but a thing I’ve seen is that because of this, LIIs work alone, and most of the time I prefer to work alone, and why the fuck does the Brazilian schooling system want people to fucking work in groups fuck you Brazilian schooling system ok? But now, here is the thing, maybe I am completely wrong with everything I wrote so far, and this is why I am going to make it public unlike past analysis I made on other systems, because someone that maybe reads this can just refute the hell out of me, and keep in mind I do not really care if you act like an asshole or like the most friendly person when showing me that I am wrong, actually I love you for showing I am wrong, you can boost your ego and be an asshole if you want to, not like me saying “please don’t hurt me!” is going to make a difference but keep in mind I don’t care because I see there are some people in this website that enjoy it when people care. Also same thing related to the data and in a general way everything, if I am not capable of looking into a fucking picture and seeing that IEI is higher than EII before making a comment who knows if this won’t happen here. Anyway, here with it going from x4 to x-4 Ti: 24 + 6 - 2 = 28 Te: 12 + 12 + 2 – 1 = 25 Ni: 4 + 3 + 6 + 5 – 2 – 4 = 12 Ne: 3 + 6 + 2 – 3 – 2 = 6 Si: -1 – 8 – 12 – 8 = -29 Se: 9 + 12 + 1 = 22 Fi: 2 – 1 – 6 – 9 – 12 = -26 Fe: -1 – 12 – 20 = -33 The results would be: Ti(28)>Te(25)>Se(22)>Ni(12)>Ne(6)>Fi(-26)>Si(-29)>Fe(-33) Compared to the previous: Ti(70)>Te(66)>Ni(65)>Se(62)>Ne(47)>Si(26)>Fi(24)>Fe(17) So what changes is that Se gets a higher positions when compared to Ni and Fi gets a higher position when compared to Si. Well, not much achieved other than the fact that, I myself consider myself LII, people I know consider myself either LIE or LSI, so I decided I would do a thing I’ve seen many people do here that is using the description of type behavior by Gulenko and most importantly by V. Megend and A. Ovcharov, and I did, I did not send it to everyone. So I ended up picking 5 people out of that 10 list, these were H, Z, Z2, J, T. I sent the descriptions by both to H, Z and J, while only the one by V. Megend and A. Ovcharov to Z2 and T, but in a general way people focused more on the descriptions by them as they have more information. I sent to all of them the ones for LSI-Ti, LSI-Se, SLE-Ti, SLE-Se, LII-Ti, LII-Ne, ILE-Ti, ILE-Ne, LIE-Te and LIE-Ni. Some put them in order like with the functions, others just gave ratings, I will consider it as in order as the functions using the ratings to order it. H: ILE-Ti=LII-Ne>LIE-Te>LII-Ti>ILE-Ne>LIE-Ni>didn’t rate others as they were too different Z: LII-Ne>ILE-Ti>LII-Ti>ILE-Ne>LIE-Ni>LIE-Te>LSI-Ti>didn’t give ratings for others Z2: LIE-Te=LII-Ti>SLE-Te>LSI-Ti>for all others as 0 J: LII-Ti>ILE-Ti>LII-Ne>LIE-Te>didn’t mention others as he said they were too different T: ILE-Ti>LSI-Ti=LII-Ti>LSI-Se>SLE-Se>SLE-Te>LIE-Te=LIE-Ni>LII-Ne>ILE-Ne I also decided to ask my parents, my dad who is a enfP INFP SLI-Si 9w1 926 sp/sx and my mom who is a ESFJ ESFJ SEE-Fi 6w7 621. Both didn’t want to order the functions, mom said IxxJ and dad ExxJ, comparing using the descriptions by V. Megend and A. Ovcharov, dad said LII-Ti, mom ILE-Ti. Keep in mind I had to translate them to Portuguese for some people, my parents included. And well, I would say ILE-Ti was the one most chosen, which is interesting because I never tested for ILE other than once in that weird test I posted here that GalaxyStrider sent to me when I was on his Discord. Anyway, still, I decided I’d just send descriptions for functions in each specific… slot? Is that the word? Well, only Z, Z2, H and J said yes, and all of them said LII was the most accurate other than Te and Ni which were LIE. Anyway, all of this just made me even more confused on my type, but I imagined it would happen, also I did send all of these people questions about what quadra I would fit, all said alpha. So, with all of this, I am not completely sure about my type and if I have wrong knowledge on socionics, but I would say I am LII-Ti, and people who are reading this, if someone at all because there are not many people in the website and this was a lot of text, at the current moment, 3803 words, I could’ve made it shorter but I wanted to give all specific data as well as some of my behavior so it is easier for others to type me based on this, also please, explain your vote, and keep in mind it is not about what the website says I am yet because I want to know what I am, and I don’t think it is socionics being a bad system yet very likely me being stupid in correlation with it. Also I imagine that going around asking people their opinions about me and trying to understand it is a very Te thing but consider I tried understanding it myself first etc. TL;DR: What’s the sociotype of a person that would write a fucking almost 4k word long comment on a underground MBTI/Jung/Enneagram/Socionics website because that person cannot fucking achieve a conclusion of which classification said person fits in? ![]() 2019-03-04 12:53:47pm (post #5517) |
phsc ![]() AAAAND just to end with the cherry on top with the greatest test ever made on earth: I am very likely a member of alpha quadra, at least I'd say so, I did not save the results from these tests from sociotype.com which gives values for quadras, and if someone has a test for it I am interested. I am not sure how much type relations play out in socionics yet, I do have a idea but I am not going to bet I know much about it thus not going to mention my opinion, but I have two people I could call friends, both being ILE, one INTP and one ENTP and both 5w4, difference being one is 592 sp/sx and other being 541 sp/so. Anyway, on the letter typings I personally think what I voted for myself is what I am, I do not know if I do or do not have aspergers and I am going to go to a psychiatrist in some period of time for some things my parents think I need to do. Anyway I might also give out the reason I am here and how I found this website out: After getting the basics of Jung and cognitive functions I wanted to find a community to talk about it, I did talk about with these two friends I mentioned but I wanted external options and maybe a way to see other type behaviour and of course get more concepts right, etc. And I decided, what place better than Reddit? well, r/mbti is crap and I do not think I need to explain why, so I imagined someone probably had made a website for typing, and I found out about mbtidatabase, which is also crap, so somewhere somehow I found out about mbtibase, which was pretty interesting but the website was dead, so I kept typing people by myself for my own sake, mostly real life people as I can get more information from them, and some day I googled "cognitive function test", saw sakinorva, took it, and found out there was more to the website but I did not act directly creating an account or anything, I actually just used the test, gave it to some people I know to see if it was great and well it is pretty decent, anyway then I found out about the actual voting part of this website and decided I would take part in it, after looking a little bit on how behaviour here works, what each kind of vote exactly does, lurking around before acting, the reason I am here is because I simply have fun typing people and this is mostly because here I can know if I am right or wrong based on others opinions and comments which makes it a little bit more accurate and etc I mean this is all pretty obvious I guess. And I guess that is it, any questions, tests, anything at all, very likely not going to happen because I know I am boring, not interesting and other things but I will not lie I do not really care but I am interested in strangers opinions on my type and well while I imagine most people who would actually vote for my type already did maybe in the future or something someone finds this comment useful, but very likely it is just going to be annoying on the front page as I think the images can break it a little bit if the resolutions are too big and the amount of text is relatively high so it might make it living hell to scroll down but meh. Also that fancy socionics test with the green bars was recommended by someone from a discord server and actually I do not know how accurate most of these are, I personally like keys2cognition for cognitive functions and the rest are just for the sake of it and the fact I did some of them in the past, and some of these I could've been affected by something in real life, anger, sadness, etc which could make the results different but that is obvious. Oh, and the name, phsc, comes from physics, tfw you're 11 and you like something, it is also the abbreviation of my real life name so that is why I picked these exact letters, actually it sounds more like p eich n see or something like that but in practice as voice-chat or something people either call me physics or phisk but not like it matters and I like the name it is not common so I kept it. ![]() 2019-02-27 09:02:31pm (post #5485) |
phsc ![]() Unironically tho I went to a psychiatrist like a week ago or something and he said I do not have autism maybe aspengers but I am going to do a ton of tests anyway so maybe, he said it is a possibility tho. Also isn't autism a LII thing? what now losers? I am always right! I have made 42 comments and I have no likes. This is so sad, can we hit 50 likes? ![]() 2019-02-21 09:50:56pm (post #5380) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2019-02-21 09:48:54pm (post #5379) |
phsc ![]() Also can you stop writing like that, it is just annoying, I know you are or want to be a INFJ ok? such wiseness. Clearly the reason is that I did not learn socionics was a thing like two weeks ago and want opinions from people who have more experience with it, ok? I am indeed the person with the most knowledge about every single topic and cannot be affected by things such as confusion. THESE VOTES ARE EVERYTHING TO ME, PLEASE RESPECT THAT!!!11!!!!!111!! but for real lower that 9 for fucks sake it annoys me and saying that is the best way to make people not lower their 9 votes anyway, but ok give me moral lesson mr INFJ ![]() 2019-02-21 09:36:13pm (post #5378) |
ResoluteSoul INFJ 1w2 145 Destination? The stars. ![]() ![]() 2019-02-21 09:19:55pm (post #5377) |
phsc ![]() I am some kind of sakinorvian terrorist I guess, same level as unabomber, also my ego and my antisocial behavior is on the same level as Bobby Fischer. Also remember to vote cp7w6 if I at some day become a sucessful musician, ok? also add a 7 to my tritype because all musicians, mostly classical because there is no such thing as music theory at all so they cannot be 5. Actually I did not understand your comment, unironically. Is it positive about me being LII or negative about me... caring about if I am LIE or LII? this might be coming off as a big aggressive but that is because I am manipulating you into changing that 9 vote to 8 because I am the 9 god, ok? Oh I forgot I am supposed to give this a rest. This is part of me roleplaying as a LIE, ok? ![]() 2019-02-21 09:01:39pm (post #5376) |
ResoluteSoul INFJ 1w2 145 Destination? The stars. ![]() ![]() 2019-02-21 08:50:47pm (post #5375) |
HairyBalls- esfj ![]() ![]() 2019-02-21 06:24:50pm (post #5370) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-02-21 06:19:51pm (post #5369) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-02-21 04:21:15pm (post #5368) |
phsc ![]() Anyway I did this test so I am posting results here and I really think the results were interesting: http://aimtoknow.com/test_beta https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/510499541792063508/547896706663055361/unknown.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/510499541792063508/547896749197492254/unknown.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/510499541792063508/547896807431077916/unknown.png I don't really think I am a SLE and from LII to SLE is pretty weird too I guess. Also I am not sure if I mentioned this but I compose, also all the pieces are pretty small: https://soundcloud.com/phsc7/etude-no2 https://soundcloud.com/phsc7/bipolar-etude-op-1 https://soundcloud.com/phsc7/string-quarter-bb-major Also I am 16 years old. And a bunch of test results: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/510499541792063508/543617308065792000/unknown.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/510499541792063508/542142278601539604/unknown.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/510499541792063508/538027566783660032/unknown.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/510499541792063508/538027587369304066/unknown.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/510499541792063508/542151348590739457/unknown.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/510499541792063508/541297892942676009/unknown.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/510499541792063508/538770574562951168/unknown.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/510499541792063508/535958548975321089/unknown.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/510499541792063508/533036285666000916/unknown.png ![]() 2019-02-20 04:56:31pm (post #5357) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-02-20 03:25:55pm (post #5356) |
switchblades INFP delete![]() we talked about this!!!! ![]() 2019-02-19 06:28:17pm (post #5339) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-02-19 05:04:17pm (post #5338) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-02-19 05:01:06pm (post #5337) |
phsc ![]() maybe if i find a good method for doing sql injections i can insert it directly or maybe it is javascript that limits it to 4 or 5 letters and if it is i can change it but it is very likely PHP anyway uh I don't think I will get banned for that because I unironically destroyed all IDR votes yesterday so I guess it is no problem ![]() 2019-02-19 04:03:06pm (post #5336) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-02-19 03:53:08pm (post #5335) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-02-17 09:14:27pm (post #5304) |
phsc ![]() http://prntscr.com/mmgkti Same concept for IDR, Enneagram and Sociotype. God how I wish I had not to do this in public because in this small period of time someone can find out how to fuck up everything up but I trust the inactivity of this website enought for that. ![]() 2019-02-17 08:39:50pm (post #5303) |
phsc ![]() ![]() 2019-02-17 07:49:50pm (post #5301) |
strawberry crisis enfp 7 ![]() ![]() 2019-02-17 07:39:13pm (post #5300) |
strawberry crisis enfp 7 ![]() ![]() 2019-02-17 07:37:26pm (post #5299) |
phsc ![]() edit: very likely it was the table that killed everything but i wont try it again ![]() 2019-02-17 07:36:32pm (post #5298) |
phsc ![]() edit didnt work sadly i have another last possibility tho ![]() 2019-02-17 07:35:01pm (post #5297) |
phsc ![]() Which is pretty simple, I will remove the p tag while in commend more, so no need for edit mode! So now in theory I am capable of doing this kind of thing and I did read the rules and I hope I will not get banned for doing but anyway really cool! So in theory this should be 2 comments by now? not sure? EDIT: so it adds one p tag per line? I am going to make another comment to try to break it again. ![]() 2019-02-17 07:32:34pm (post #5296) |
phsc ![]() I made most of my comments in the following character's pages: Asuka Langley Sohryu, Socrates, 9w1, Libertarianism and INFP. And no, this does not say I have Si and remember things, I unironically wrote it out because I planned on making this post a while ago but I was thought I did not have enought comments for anything to be possible to be deduced from it. Now, since I have a reason to make a post, I will use the rest of it to try to make a few tests using this text editor and the website in a general way, and also the edit feature if I got right what it does. I think testing the features giving test results is a great idea. ![]() 2019-02-17 06:33:02pm (post #5288) |
related entries |