hahaha, I'm getting a type evaluation all of a sudden? Yes, I'll ban you if there's "no loss" to you. You're clearly apathetic about something I (and presumably most others on the site) care about, so I don't expect you to fulfill my tacit contract. Bye.

0

Cannot you just verify if the IPs are the same making so it is not possible for one to comment or vote or like twice unless that person uses a VPN which would already dodge a ban so it is not like it makes much difference? the only argument I could see made for this is that maybe someone uses this to do the opposite order and get IPs but from voting I do not think it is possible so there's that, or make it even better, make so the votes appear for the user as they were made but it does not appear for others, save it on cookies or something.

People can't make new accounts unless they change their IP, so it's not really a measure I can usually counter that way. 
 

Anyway so consider what I have seen looking at MBTIbase wouldn't it just be better for you to create a literal copy of this website that goes into another database and that second page is purely oriented towards "most likely X" and similar crap that existed in MBTIbase and then solving the problem without needing to use that specific page you made because it does not allow voting and I think a relatively high amount of people who like to use this website would not enjoy commenting their votes and would prefer that but this is me assuming stuff.

I could do that, yes. The audience for that type of thing isn't super big which is why I don't know if it's so necessary but it's not particularly difficult. I think you have the right idea -- I'll see what the best way to implement that is.

Also remember to fix that thing I emailed you because I can still abuse it (not sure if you did the fix) and it is extremely easy to find out how to do it but I imagine that it is not happening at least right now and if you do not want to fix or do anything I said your call your website your rules and not like it is even that much of a problem as you can just constantly save backups which at most would make it annoying if the person constantly did it but then in that case you'd have already fixed it after like two times because it is rather simple.

I'll take a look, thanks for the heads-up.

0

Ban me if you want. It is no loss to me.

0

There's nothing wrong with being a 6.

0

I'm not trying to be amusing. You seem very in touch with your super ego rather than id.

0

Your rhetoric is amusing, but it seems like you're only trying to reach for the door. It is a big deal to me because vote manipulation kills the very purpose of this site, and it only exists for people like you, people who want to have a usable catalog of personalities that they can vote types on. Are you going to stop or should I just go ahead and ban your own remaining accounts?

0

How about you delete those accounts? I don't even recall making them. My phone acts up sometimes and they can log into those accounts sometimes.

0

You seem more like a 6 than a 7. Big deal, everyone has alts.

0

Yikes, you liked your own comment with an alt that you created to vote on this entry a second time. Not only that, but it turns out you have nine accounts that you occasionally vote twice on entries with. I remember warning you in the past about voting on the same entry with more than one account, and it looks like you decided to run wild instead. Should I give you the benefit of the doubt?

1

Someone disintegrated to a 1 hard.

1

No but it is mostly correlated with type 6 not 2 which a lot of women often mistype as.

1

I deleted a lot of similar entries because they fit into any of the following criteria: 1) too vague 2) too subjective 3) presumptuous/unproven premises 4) umbrella-like to a faulty extent 5) so barely type-related (because nothing is truly unrelated yadda yadda) that it isn't worth keeping as an entry

I'd delete this entry too but I'll make an example out of it instead: this is barely type-related (is being worried about other people really an auto 6 thing now?), and too vague (why?). It's just pollution. People aren't going out of their way to search for "that friend that asks blablabla" in the search bar -- this is more of a mental exercise kind of thing that people have fun with, and I'd like to ask you to make discussions about these sorts of things rather than voting entries. They're more productive anyhow, since they often aren't best represented by the voting systems that are meant for specific people or specific traits.

This does remind me, however, that there really isn't any reason for there to be a "most likelies" category at all and I'll either remove this sometime soon or just make them auto-discussions. I'd like to entertain this somewhere for the people who are so entertained by it, but this databank isn't really the best place for it. Maybe start something here?

1