Nero ~ MBTI, Enneagram, and Socionics Personality Type

Nero ~ MBTI, Enneagram, and Socionics Personality Type

Nero

Roman emperor

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psycho

ISFP 1

3w4 3

7w8 1

sx/so 2

so/sx 1

EIE 4

SEI 1

FEVL 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

public myers-briggs votes

(22/03/06 02:18) GIJOEBusta Cap: ISFP

(20/03/04 23:57) LadyX: ENTP

(20/03/04 23:24) Thyssen: ENP

(19/12/06 17:20) Tman: P

(19/05/10 18:48) Lol: ISFP

(20/03/05 00:18) Jacobus: ESFP

public function votes

(22/03/06 02:18) GIJOEBusta Cap: ISFP

public enneagram votes

(22/03/06 02:18) GIJOEBusta Cap: 3w4

(20/03/04 23:57) LadyX: 3w4

(20/03/04 23:24) Thyssen: 7w8

(19/12/05 22:44) Tman: 3w4

public instinctual variant votes

(22/03/06 02:18) GIJOEBusta Cap: sx/so

(20/03/04 23:57) LadyX: so/sx

(19/12/05 22:46) Tman: sx/so

public tritype® votes

(20/03/05 00:18) Jacobus: 378

(20/03/04 23:57) LadyX: 378

(20/03/04 23:24) Thyssen: 784

(19/12/05 22:44) Tman: 386

public sociotype votes

(22/03/06 23:57) Woll Smoth: SEI

(22/03/06 02:18) GIJOEBusta Cap: EIE

(20/03/04 23:24) Thyssen: EIE

(19/12/05 22:45) Tman: EIE

(19/03/19 15:06) Phantom: EIE

public psychosophy votes

(20/03/05 00:18) Jacobus: FEVL

public hexaco votes

Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI

I understand the fact that the idea of reilgous torlrince as it's now practiced is a reltivly new ideas. If you had said that based of the understanding of the times, the view of a group of people worshiping none state sactioned Gods would be a threat, I would agree (although I still wouldn't think that would apply to some tinny cult who at the time had basicly no social power.) But calling buring people alive for your own intertanmnt (which is a historcal fact) "common sense" is fucked up. The real solcution to this problem to have a secualar state, with no ofical religous posistion. There may always be people who think there God is the only true one, and hold that posistion with utter certinty. But so long as there not dumb enough to try and force it onto the state (and we imprision anyone who dose) it should be manigable.

0
2019-12-11 11:16:26am (post #7504)

fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST

lol i just watched one video of vikernes in my entire life. they was a threat because of their monotheism. the principle of one god for all human who create undoubtly religious conflict was totally opposed to the polytheism that even allowed "unknow gods". A threat for a civilization is not only a bunch of violent people, it is a violation of fundational principle of the civilization. this civilization did survive long because they was far less laxist than the later was with the christian abomination. + contrary to vark vigernes i don't believe in any superstitious ritual aspect of paganism but rather on usefulness of ancient conception (like the greek/roman vision of political freedom)+ i am oriented toward roman and greek civilization not nordic, so thanks for being of topic again, Jacobus

0
2019-12-11 09:15:19am (post #7503)

Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leK2WkAHLYk

0
2019-12-08 12:45:27pm (post #7501)

Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE

Fg is an idiot who buys wholesale into whatever pseudo-intellectual pagans like Varg Vikernes say, so of course he would think it's necessary to slaughter thousands of innocents to preserve a civilization that lasted centuries after the death of Nero.

0
2019-12-08 12:37:20pm (post #7500)

Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI

What the fuck do you mean "threat to there civlizatoin?" At this point, christians wern't doing anything to anyone? Even if a chrstian did start the fire of Rome (which no one new who did it) that wouldn't justify the persucution of an entire reilgion, who had done nothing?

0
2019-12-08 12:04:41pm (post #7499)

fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST

persecuting christians was common sens in roman empire, they was a threat for their civilization

0
2019-12-08 12:23:54am (post #7497)

Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI

While that's true, there also seems to be strong evidence that he did persecute christians, even if tails of his monstrosity were greatly exaggerated, he was still a horrible man.

0
2019-12-06 05:20:42pm (post #7496)

fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST

modern historian are far less portraying him as evil as the historian of nero's time. It was probably because most historian was member of the parliementarian while Nero was an emperor and reduced their influence, so it was a conflict of interest rather than Nero being a monster

0
2019-12-06 02:00:06pm (post #7495)

Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI

Yes, for example, the fact that he sang of the fall of troy while Rome burned. But everything esle I've gathered seems to be from reliable soruces.

0
2019-12-05 10:59:46pm (post #7494)

Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI

I was just reading about this guy and holy shit, I knew he was bad, but the son of a bitch burned people at the stake during fany parties for entertainment, just because of the religion they worshiped. I didn't know I had it in me for such disgusted for a historical figure. He was truly an evil man.

0
2019-12-05 10:52:22pm (post #7492)

*related entries*
Octavian (Augustus) Roman Emperor
Hadrian Roman emperor
Constantine Roman emperor
Trajan Roman emperor
Justinian Roman emperor
Theodosius I Roman emperor
Marcus Aurelius Roman emperor
lxbfYeaa http://www.example.com/
ubaTaeCJ http://www.example.com/
Alexander Hamilton American Politics
lxbfYeaa http://www.example.com/
lxbfYeaa http://www.example.com/