| public myers-briggs votes | (25/07/21 22:22) nicotineseries: SJ | | (22/03/08 17:50) Woll Smoth: SJ |
| (20/04/19 14:13) Vindicator Phoenix: ISTJ |
| (19/05/07 23:27) LadyX: ISTJ |
| (19/05/05 18:18) tman: ISTJ |
| (19/05/05 15:03) Taco110: ESTJ |
|
| public function votes | (25/06/27 15:30) Woll Smoth: ISTJ | | (19/05/05 18:18) tman: ISTJ |
| (19/05/05 15:03) Taco110: ESTJ |
|
| public enneagram votes | (25/07/21 22:22) nicotineseries: 1wb | | (20/03/16 13:09) bibliology: 1w2 |
| (19/05/07 23:27) LadyX: 1w9 |
| (19/05/05 18:19) tman: 1w9 |
| (19/05/05 15:03) Taco110: 1w2 |
|
| public instinctual variant votes | (20/03/16 13:09) bibliology: sp/so | | (19/05/07 23:27) LadyX: sp/so |
| (19/05/05 18:19) tman: sp/so |
| (19/05/05 15:03) Taco110: sp/so |
|
| public sociotype votes | (25/06/27 15:29) Woll Smoth: LSI | | (20/04/19 14:13) Vindicator Phoenix: LSI |
| (19/05/05 18:20) tman: LSI |
| (19/05/05 15:05) Diobono: LSE |
| (19/05/05 16:43) Taco110: LSI |
|
| public psychosophy votes | (20/01/01 11:36) Tman: LFVE | |
The more I think about it, LSI makes way more sense.