| menu |
J. K. Rowling
Author

| e | i |
| n | s |
| f | t |
| p | j |
| function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
| h |
| e |
| x |
| a |
| c |
| o |
| public myers-briggs votes | (25/07/28 10:30) nicotineseries: INFx |
| (20/05/14 18:19) Lucy_Acid: INTJ |
| (20/04/14 03:07) Lol: INFJ |
| (19/02/03 14:51) LadyX: INFJ |
| (21/01/28 14:17) Tman: INFJ |
| (19/01/16 06:57) Flower-like: ISFJ |
| (18/12/27 19:25) Jacobus: ISFJ |
| (18/12/10 18:23) mineshield: INFJ |
| (18/11/24 17:27) twinpinks: INFJ |
| (18/11/22 19:31) Tch: INFJ |
| (18/09/27 13:57) Teru Mikami: INFJ |
| (18/09/03 21:55) Nyx: INFJ |
| (18/05/14 01:48) LVNA: INFJ |
| (18/05/11 02:53) *~snow~*: INFJ |
| (18/05/02 07:19) Maul: INFJ |
| (18/05/02 12:29) strawberry crisis: INFJ |
| (18/05/02 10:33) Taco110: INFJ |
| (18/05/02 07:38) Stephen Hearts: INFJ |
| public function votes | (25/07/24 06:59) nicotineseries: ISTJ |
| (25/06/20 10:22) rock and roll: INFP |
| (23/02/25 04:23) GIJOEBusta Cap: INFP |
| (20/04/14 03:07) Lol: INFP |
| (20/01/19 02:35) Phantom: INFJ |
| (19/08/22 22:21) tch: INFP |
| (19/03/07 22:26) Taco110: INFP |
| (18/12/10 18:24) mineshield: INFJ |
| (18/09/27 13:57) Teru Mikami: INFP |
| (18/09/03 21:55) Nyx: INFP |
| (18/09/04 08:59) fg: INFP |
| (18/05/02 03:15) Tiger: INFJ |
| (18/05/30 03:12) strawberry crisis: INFP |
| public enneagram votes | (25/06/20 10:22) rock and roll: 9w1 |
| (20/06/28 03:09) Flower-like: 9w1 |
| (21/01/28 13:38) Tman: 1w9 |
| (19/03/09 02:44) bioomer: 9w1 |
| (19/02/03 14:51) LadyX: 9w1 |
| (18/12/27 19:26) Jacobus: 2w1 |
| (18/09/27 13:57) Teru Mikami: 6w5 |
| (19/05/30 15:35) LVNA: 9w1 |
| (18/05/13 02:54) fg: 9w1 |
| (18/05/11 01:51) Maul: 1w9 |
| (18/05/02 03:15) Tiger: 9w1 |
| (18/05/30 01:13) strawberry crisis: 9w1 |
| (18/05/02 10:34) Taco110: 9w1 |
| (18/05/02 07:38) Stephen Hearts: 9w1 |
| public instinctual variant votes | (21/01/28 14:17) Tman: so/sx |
| (20/11/09 01:00) LadyX: so/sx |
| (18/12/10 18:24) mineshield: sx/so |
| (18/09/27 13:58) Teru Mikami: so/sx |
| (18/05/13 02:55) fg: so/sx |
| (18/05/02 07:19) Maul: so/sx |
| (18/05/02 10:34) Taco110: so/sx |
| (18/05/02 07:39) Stephen Hearts: so/sx |
| public tritype® votes | (21/01/28 14:17) Tman: 146 |
| (19/02/03 14:52) LadyX: 963 |
| (19/01/17 02:40) ResoluteSoul: 471 |
| public sociotype votes | (25/07/06 17:12) Woll Smoth: ESI |
| (25/07/13 15:31) nicotineseries: ESI |
| (25/06/20 10:22) rock and roll: EII |
| (20/06/21 08:16) Flower-like: EII |
| (20/05/14 18:19) Lucy_Acid: LII |
| (20/01/19 02:35) Phantom: EII |
| (19/08/22 22:30) Tman: EII |
| (19/08/22 22:26) DJ: ESE |
| (18/10/17 01:29) magnets29: EII |
| (18/07/11 10:56) fg: EII |
| (18/05/30 01:13) strawberry crisis: ESI |
| (18/05/14 01:48) LVNA: ESI |
| (18/07/11 10:58) kawaii: ESI |
| public psychosophy votes | (20/09/27 10:55) Flower-like: ELVF |
| (20/05/14 18:19) Lucy_Acid: EVLF |
| (20/01/19 02:35) Phantom: EVFL |
| public hexaco votes |
nicotineseries I still have no clue until now.I don't know but I think it is in vain to search about that again, In my research I seeing some of Se? In this person tweet in his X account (former name Twitter) but yeah I now don't know about this person again. 2025-07-13 08:49:59pm (post #10126) |
Woll Smoth Unfortunately I don't know enough about David Deutsch to say what type he is and isn't. Though I would be very interested to hear what type you think he is and why.2025-07-13 08:42:47pm (post #10125) |
nicotineseries Hi, Woll Smoth users, sorry for bothering your time. Can I ask for your help with the one in IDRlabs' "Additional Typings?" Well, that's David Deutsch, a physicist. He was the one who advocated Karl Popper's philosophy as far as I remember. I actually think it's different, because he's a bit of an introvert, maybe he's an ENTP? Is that true, but an INTP? Maybe. But I think he is still in the xSFJ category of whatever cognitive function is, but is that true? Why do I have a different feeling?But yeah, if you want to add it to Sakinorva Databank while explaining the function axis and the tools for typing someone, you can also do it in the comments column. 2025-07-13 08:27:03pm (post #10124) |
Woll Smoth I think JK Rowling is STJ (and most certainly NOT INFP). For evidence:Rowling: "[If you] sit down and just let [yourself] just write ... normally that means you’re going to hit about one and a half good ideas and the rest will be rubbish. It’s normally very, very, very finely planned – what I’m going to do that day even. I make meticulous plans in advance and I bore children rotten when I meet them and say to them, 'Yes your teachers are right – plan it. You'll never write something as good if you just sit down and ramble'." Rowling: "I have master files on all these different characters. I have huge amounts of background just to keep myself orientated. I know where Strike lived. A huge amount about his mother’s history that I will never use. It sounds prosaic, like being a sort of filing clerk for your own work, but that’s what you do. ... I really like the sense of knowing where I’m going." Rowling: "I have a large and complicated chart propped on the desk in front of me to remind me what happens where, how, to whom and which bits of crucial information need to be slipped into which innocent-looking chapters." Rowling: "I plan; I really plan quite meticulously. I know it is sometimes quite boring because when people say to me, 'I write stories at school and what advice would you give me to make my stories better?' And I always say (and people’s faces often fall when I say), 'You have to plan,' and they say, 'Oh, I prefer just writing and seeing where it takes me.' Sometimes writing and seeing where it takes you will lead you to some really good ideas, but I would say nearly always it won’t be as good as if you sat down first and thought, Where do I want to go, what end am I working towards, what would be good—a good start?" As IDRlabs have said "As Jung says, Te likes to put everything on a formula, and then follow that formula. Te likes structure, fixed standards, and set procedures." Unlike Fi dominant types who repress Te and therefore are much more likely to disdain standard operating procedures, Rowling seems very much oriented towards it (in other words, she probably has conscious Te). And not only that, her plans are also much more in line with ALL OF THE DETAILS. Si has a better awareness of all the minutiae than both N functions. Now which STJ type I think is more likely atm? IDK, but Rowling I can confidently is NOT INFP (or any FP type for that matter). If she isn't STJ then maybe I could see the argument for SFJ but certainly not INFP. 2025-07-13 03:42:38pm (post #10123) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE I don't care about the cunt's progressive posturing so much as how her works have stunted the maturity of an entire generation of young women.2018-12-27 07:28:27pm (post #4431) |
strawberry crisis enfp 7 2018-05-30 01:11:13pm (post #864) |
|
Stephen Hearts ENFJ 2w1 remember what your heart is for I have a really hard time seeing her as a core 1 from interviews and testimonials from thr people she’s worked with. She was extremely accompdating and easygoing when it came to adapting Harry Potter that the main screenwriter even remarked on it as a breath of fresh air and not at all the norm. I don’t think having strong social justice values alone qualifies her as a 1– especially in light of the Johnny Depp apologia. She seems like a really agreeable and harmony oriented 9 from interviews. Not critical at all.2018-05-30 06:51:49am (post #860) |
Maul INTJ 5w6 sp I'm thinking it's possibly she's a 1w9 with all the fuss on twitter.2018-05-11 01:50:53am (post #363) |
Tiger ENTJ 3w4 LIE annoying SJW2018-05-02 03:15:43pm (post #22) |
| related entries |