Python
| e | i |
| n | s |
| f | t |
| p | j |
| function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | ||||
|
|
|
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
| h |
| e |
| x |
| a |
| c |
| o |
| public myers-briggs votes |
| (21/11/17 20:59) bostonma: NTJ |
| (20/12/23 12:28) Mastema: EJ |
| public function votes |
| (21/11/17 20:59) bostonma: INTJ |
| (20/12/23 09:09) Mastema: ENTJ |
| public enneagram votes |
| (20/12/23 08:23) Mastema: 3w4 |
| public instinctual variant votes |
| public tritype® votes |
| (20/12/23 08:23) Mastema: 351 |
| public sociotype votes |
| (20/12/23 12:28) Mastema: LSE |
| public psychosophy votes |
| public hexaco votes |
I mostly considered the community of Python, for the reason they learn or use it - easy-to-use UI, less complicated and very fast to get results from, "intuitive" and so on. To which I could see in socionics Te. I can see your argument on Fe making sense, but wouldn't that also connect to Te, since it is easier to use and such, focusing on what it delivers? 