menu |
Buddha (Siddhārtha Gautama)
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (20/06/22 23:13) fleetingpetals1: INFJ |
(20/03/23 19:17) Jacobus: INFJ |
(20/02/13 14:45) Thyssen: INT |
(19/08/20 13:24) fsninetwo: INFJ |
(21/04/18 11:54) Tman: INTP |
(18/12/08 11:10) tch: INFJ |
(18/11/08 01:10) LadyX: INFJ |
(20/08/08 05:53) Diobono: INT |
public function votes | (25/08/02 09:52) nicotineseries: ENFJ |
(22/03/08 16:34) Woll Smoth: ENFJ |
(20/06/23 12:09) tch: INFJ |
(20/02/13 14:45) Thyssen: INFJ |
(19/08/20 13:24) fsninetwo: INFJ |
(19/09/16 15:11) Tman: INFJ |
public enneagram votes | (20/02/13 14:45) Thyssen: 9w1 |
(19/08/20 13:24) fsninetwo: 9w1 |
(19/01/10 00:31) tman: 9w1 |
(18/11/08 01:09) LadyX: 9w1 |
(20/02/13 18:02) Diobono: 9w1 |
public instinctual variant votes | (20/08/08 05:53) Diobono: sp/sx |
(20/02/13 14:45) Thyssen: sp/sx |
(19/08/20 13:24) fsninetwo: sp/so |
(19/04/04 19:57) tman: sp/so |
(19/07/07 22:37) LadyX: sp/so |
public tritype® votes | (20/02/13 14:45) Thyssen: 952 |
(19/08/20 13:24) fsninetwo: 952 |
(19/07/07 22:37) LadyX: 952 |
(19/01/10 00:32) tman: 952 |
public sociotype votes | (25/07/31 17:01) nicotineseries: ILI |
(20/06/22 23:13) fleetingpetals1: LII |
(20/02/13 14:45) Thyssen: ILI |
(19/12/23 22:25) ethan: SEI |
(19/10/17 14:48) Tman: ILI |
(18/09/16 16:59) Diobono: ILI |
(18/05/25 05:55) lvna: ILI |
public psychosophy votes | (20/06/22 23:13) fleetingpetals1: EVLF |
(20/04/18 21:10) Tman: LEFV |
(20/03/23 19:17) Jacobus: EVLF |
(20/02/13 14:45) Thyssen: LEFV |
public hexaco votes |
nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi I'm so sorry I'm sorry if my words are wrong, now if you want tell me so you can inform that you can do. ![]() 2025-07-31 05:19:10pm (post #10255) |
Woll Smoth ![]() IDRlabs Admin: “It’s hard to type the Buddha, because while we can isolate some traits, and they all seem to point to NFJ, the sources also contradict each other a lot, way more than with the PreSocratics. So INFJ or ENFJ could both make sense for the Buddha, depending on where the stress is placed. A good portrait of the Buddha as someone we’d type ENFJ can be found in professor Gombrich’s work. That the Buddha must have had well-developed Ti is a common argument. That’s why you should read Gombrich if you haven’t already. He makes a good case for how many of the things that are today thought of as philosophical analyses by the Buddha were actually appropriations of Brahmin and Jain tropes, adapted to take his audience and followers where he felt he needed to go. Also, a lot of the Buddhist Ti-style philosophy and analysis of phenomena is not the Buddha’s but attempts to reify his teaching into a coherent system, by intellectual monks. This latter process we know more about and they seem to have had very well-developed Ti (and Ne).“ Overall the ENFJ arguments seem to be stronger than the INFJ arguments at this time. ![]() 2025-07-31 02:32:49pm (post #10254) |
related entries |