menu |
Jungian Ti type
Psychological Types
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (24/12/28 16:28) gustyd: INTJ |
(20/12/19 06:42) Freaky_sage: INTJ |
(19/08/22 23:41) Tman: ITP |
(19/02/05 22:14) Taco110: INTJ |
(18/06/15 04:11) EON: INTJ |
(18/06/11 05:32) lvna: INTJ |
(18/06/11 04:18) edza: INTJ |
(18/06/11 02:25) Diobono: INTJ |
public function votes | (24/12/28 16:28) gustyd: INTP |
(22/04/08 03:46) Woll Smoth: INFJ |
(21/08/20 12:52) Lawless: INTP |
(19/02/05 22:17) Taco110: INFJ |
(18/06/11 05:32) lvna: INFJ |
(18/06/11 04:18) edza: INFJ |
(19/05/21 09:36) DIobono: INFJ |
public enneagram votes | (24/12/28 16:28) gustyd: 5w6 |
(21/08/20 12:52) Lawless: 5w6 |
(20/12/19 06:42) Freaky_sage: 5w6 |
(19/10/25 11:52) Taco110: 5w6 |
(19/10/25 12:41) Thyssen: 5w6 |
(19/02/06 14:47) tman: 5w6 |
(18/06/11 04:25) edza: 5w4 |
(18/06/11 02:23) Diobono: 5w4 |
public instinctual variant votes | (24/12/28 16:28) gustyd: sp/sx |
(21/08/20 12:52) Lawless: sp/so |
(20/12/19 06:42) Freaky_sage: sp/sx |
(19/10/25 11:52) Taco110: sp/sx |
(19/08/22 23:22) Tman: sp/sx |
(18/06/11 02:23) Diobono: sp/sx |
public tritype® votes | (24/12/28 16:28) gustyd: 514 |
(19/08/22 23:22) Tman: 593 |
public sociotype votes | (24/12/28 16:28) gustyd: LII |
(22/03/28 03:26) Woll Smoth: LII |
(21/08/20 12:52) Lawless: LII |
(20/12/19 06:42) Freaky_sage: LII |
(19/10/25 11:52) Taco110: LII |
(18/08/23 11:03) switchblades: LII |
(18/06/13 01:18) Zeego: LII |
(18/06/11 05:32) lvna: LII |
(18/06/11 04:25) edza: LII |
(18/06/11 03:11) Diobono: ILI |
public psychosophy votes | (24/12/28 16:28) gustyd: LVEF |
public hexaco votes |
Diobono int 5w4 ili![]() ![]() 2018-06-14 04:48:09am (post #1217) |
Diobono int 5w4 ili![]() Man i'm switching over to socionics in this period its more interesting than mbti and function typing is more justifiable lol. ![]() 2018-06-14 04:47:33am (post #1216) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST![]() ![]() 2018-06-12 04:46:12am (post #1181) |
lvna ![]() Plato (LII and 1w9) Jung (LII and 5w6) Wittgenstein (LII and 5w4) Chomsky (LII and 1w9) Dante (LII and 1w9) Spinoza (SLI and 5w6) There are a lot of different archetypes here. Sometimes you have a mixed F-N person: Joanna Newsom (Jungian Fe and INFJ by letters) Sufjan Stevens is Ni-Fi or Fi-Ni, probably the latter. De Beauvoir seems legitimately EII, INFJ, 1w9 etc. Then you have a few Ni types on there: Schopenahuer (INTx 5w4 ILI, Ni-Ti) and Lars Von Trier (INTx 4w5 and IxI - pure Ni) It's quite the mix. ![]() 2018-06-11 05:40:05pm (post #1176) |
edza ENTJ 8w7 SLE![]() ![]() 2018-06-11 04:24:55pm (post #1175) |
edza ENTJ 8w7 SLE![]() For IDRlabs I feel like I need to bring up not only INTP and INTJ but also INFJ of all things. They seem to have categorized a prioritized subjective factor/ primordial vision as "Ni" a lot of times, while Jung would consider that more of an "introvert" thing, and in the case of the Ti type, subjective thought constructions are the result. So what would be considered in Jung as basically: Subjective factor -> T = Ti type would in IDRlabs be converted to: Ni -> Ti = INFJ Which is why a lot of the more subjective philosophers who would be clear Ti types in Jung end up getting typed as INFJ if their subjective factor is overwhelming. It's actually the Ti types that balance their Ti out with little Te and grounding their subjectivity a bit that tend to land the INTP typing from IDRlabs. So while I may be reaching a little bit here, I think there's a case to be made for INFJ, at least in the sense of the purest Ti types getting typed as INFJ in IDRlabs, although they do also list people as INFJ who are not that. So the INFJ category over there ends up being an inconsistent hodgepodge of different archetypes, one of which resembles Jung's pure Ti type. Their INTJ seems about equal parts Ti and Te, with a few exceptions, which is why I would rank it below both INFJ and INTP. ![]() 2018-06-11 04:18:01pm (post #1174) |
Diobono int 5w4 ili![]() To summarise i think intp and intj are generally on the same level in terms of mental wankery so both could fit into the jungian Ti type. ![]() 2018-06-11 03:25:22pm (post #1171) |
Diobono int 5w4 ili![]() As he says it's "compounded by numberless impressions and experiences in the practice of Psychiatry". So it's interesting to me to understand what the pure function types of jung would translate into by using Mbti and the new functions descriptions. Jungian Ti type is obviously a mish mash of various intx 5w4 maybe 5w6. But i'd go with 5w4 and also Ili because he does not have the consistency of a 5w6 and his ideas are too personalized and not systematic to be lii. He also fits very well with fi as a suggestive function and he sounds sort of sexual instinct in how he has "primitive affects" and has a weak spot for intimacy, obviously sp first though In Idr vote he would probably be intp considering functionally how he puts the theory and "subjective factor" above factual data. But tbh i disagree with the idr intj and don't see why a Ni dominant would not be a theory first, facts later even going by their functions descriptions. ![]() 2018-06-11 03:10:04pm (post #1170) |
related entries |