William Clifford
Philospher and Mathmatican
| e | i |
| n | s |
| f | t |
| p | j |
| function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
| h |
| e |
| x |
| a |
| c |
| o |
| public myers-briggs votes | (19/09/04 23:32) LadyX: INTP |
| (21/04/16 20:06) Tman: INTP |
| public function votes | (18/12/21 00:44) tman: INTP |
| public enneagram votes | (19/09/05 12:17) LadyX: 5w6 |
| (18/12/21 00:47) tman: 5w6 |
| public instinctual variant votes | (19/09/04 23:32) LadyX: sp/sx |
| (19/11/30 02:13) Tman: sp/sx |
| public tritype® votes | (20/02/17 13:07) Tman: 514 |
| (19/09/04 23:32) LadyX: 514 |
| public sociotype votes | (19/04/10 18:33) tman: LII |
| public psychosophy votes | (19/10/15 15:25) Tman: LVEF |
| public hexaco votes |
Being a 4 isn't what determins your creativty. Being a 4 is about a core sense of being broken, and having some deep flaw, that makes you beuetful. Granted this often leads to artistic expetstion, but there's nothing to say a none four coundn't aslo be creative. He dose have a storng indvidualist bent, but it's combind with a conceren for the group as a whole, and both the 5 and 1 can already have an induvist bent (ESPECIALY the 5.) I still don't see why Sx>So.
Such a creative individual - it is hard for me to not find a 4 component, either a wing or in the tritype. 6 wing --> skepticism fits with his dedication to facts not faith and eschewing superstition. His "mindstuff" sounds like a phenomenology precursor - fitting with the 5w6. I'm not really convinced on the 2 in his tritype - 4 seems more in line with the overall picture to me.