| public myers-briggs votes | (19/05/19 02:26) INTJ-2698: INTP | | (19/05/12 00:32) tch: INTP |
| (19/05/07 23:29) LadyX: INTP |
| (20/12/24 20:14) Tman: INTP |
| (19/05/06 12:22) Taco110: INTP |
|
| public function votes | (20/05/01 21:57) tch: INTP | | (19/05/19 02:26) INTJ-2698: INTP |
| (20/06/18 13:37) Tman: INTP |
| (19/05/06 12:22) Taco110: INTP |
|
| public enneagram votes | (19/12/14 16:12) Tman: 5wb | | (19/05/19 02:26) INTJ-2698: 5wb |
| (19/05/07 23:29) LadyX: 5w4 |
| (19/05/06 12:22) Taco110: 5w4 |
|
| public instinctual variant votes | (19/05/07 23:29) LadyX: sp/sx | | (20/06/18 13:37) Tman: sp/sx |
| (19/05/06 12:22) Taco110: sp/sx |
|
| public tritype® votes | (20/11/16 16:26) Tman: 594 | |
| public sociotype votes | (19/07/28 18:52) tman: LII | | (19/05/19 02:26) INTJ-2698: LII |
| (19/05/06 12:22) Taco110: LII |
|
| public psychosophy votes | (20/12/24 20:13) Tman: FLEV | |
Really the only logical and intellectually honest position you can take on the issue of religion. It's not a matter of playing both sides so much as it is a matter of there's no proof for a God nor is there any way to disprove God. In order to make claims, you must provide evidence and/or sound, cogent reasoning. Instead, it's a matter of likelihood. God likely doesn't exist because there isn't any proof and the reasoning presented by theists is circular and retarded beyond belief (using the Bible as evidence of itself - yeah, not gonna work lmao that shit contradicts itself so many times.