| public myers-briggs votes | (20/01/09 16:16) Skyvermin: INTP | | (20/01/09 06:26) Diobono: INTP |
| (19/07/13 02:15) Nothing Matters: INTP |
| (19/07/02 05:31) LadyX: INTP |
| (19/07/01 19:33) tman: INTP |
|
| public function votes | (25/07/16 10:17) nicotineseries: INTP | | (20/01/09 06:27) Diobono: ENFP |
| (19/07/13 02:15) Nothing Matters: INTP |
| (19/07/01 19:33) tman: INTP |
|
| public enneagram votes | (20/01/09 06:29) Diobono: 6wb | | (19/07/02 05:31) LadyX: 6w5 |
| (20/08/12 15:52) Tman: 5wb |
|
| public instinctual variant votes | (19/07/02 05:31) LadyX: sp/so | |
| public tritype® votes | (20/08/12 15:52) Tman: 594 | | (20/01/09 06:30) Diobono: 694 |
| (19/07/02 05:31) LadyX: 694 |
|
| public sociotype votes | (20/01/09 01:31) Thyssen: ILI | | (19/07/02 14:39) Diobono: LII |
| (19/07/02 13:22) Teru Mikami: ILI |
| (19/07/01 19:33) tman: LII |
|
| public psychosophy votes | (20/08/12 15:53) Tman: LVEF | |
| public hexaco votes | (20/01/09 06:26) Diobono: HEXACO | |
Yeah, I know 3 philosophy majors and one history major with a lot of interest in philosophy and all 4 of them are INTP as all fuck. It seems like it would be something that appeals to INTPs too because its internal logic for the sake of internal logic usually without much practical appeal in most cases. I think it's interesting from a historical perspective because of the very real world effect different movements have on politics and what not but the four people I know (even the history major, bizarrely) seemed interested in the concepts alone and their historical value was of secondary significance.