menu |
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Philosopher
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (21/01/09 15:25) Helvetica: INTP |
(20/08/12 15:56) Tman: INTP |
public function votes | (21/01/09 15:25) Helvetica: INTP |
(19/02/25 21:59) tman: INTP |
(19/01/31 15:13) Lol: INTP |
(18/05/13 04:50) fg: INTP |
public enneagram votes | (21/01/09 15:25) Helvetica: 5w6 |
(19/02/26 15:46) tman: 5w6 |
(19/01/31 15:13) Lol: 5w6 |
(18/05/13 04:50) fg: 5w6 |
public instinctual variant votes | (21/01/09 15:25) Helvetica: sp/sx |
(18/05/13 04:50) fg: sp/sx |
public tritype® votes | (21/01/09 15:25) Helvetica: 514 |
(20/10/30 08:04) Diobono: 593 |
(19/02/26 00:29) Kawaii: 514 |
public sociotype votes | (21/01/09 15:25) Helvetica: ILE |
(19/06/15 09:41) Phantom: LII |
(19/05/06 19:32) Avalonia: ILE |
(22/02/15 13:10) Tman: ILE |
(19/09/08 14:36) Lol: ILE |
(18/11/13 05:57) echidna1000: ILE |
public psychosophy votes | (20/10/30 08:04) Diobono: LEVF |
(19/10/20 15:41) fg: LEVF |
public hexaco votes |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST yes i was hesitating between LEVF and LFVE, but with your information LEVF fit more 0 2019-10-20 03:41:42pm (post #7264) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST i don't know exactly the date, the information was from one of my philosophy teacher's anecdote in our class about ethic (he is an admirer of both Leibniz and Spinoza btw), he probably got this information from this book https://www.amazon.fr/Spinoza-Leibniz-Rencontres-controverses-r%C3%A9ceptions/dp/2840509431 . you will probably say that the source is not enough suffisent since you can't verify the information so i will ask you to adopt a fiabilist epistemological behavior (he have absolutely not any interest to lie or invent this + lie is rarer than truth telling due to basic anthropological need) or at least beleiveling in epistemological virtue theory (his social position is a field where a certain intellectual rigor and honesty tend to be cultivated) . 0 2019-10-20 03:40:18pm (post #7263) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST V is linked to honor don't refer only to https://www.attitudinalpsyche.com 's description who like socionics.com is like a "for dummies" version of the theory 0 2019-10-20 03:27:00pm (post #7261) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST 2nd V is THE honorable function. just read this https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&tab=wT&authuser=0&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20140408215506%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.strannik.de%2Flovesyntax%2F24_lwpe.htm 0 2019-10-20 03:24:14pm (post #7260) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST Leibniz was not honorable at all, he met Spinoza in person and did not openly disagree with his philosophical though in person, but after made a whole book of metaphysic writed against the ethic of Spinoza based on it and answered that he was not inspired at all by it and that he despised this work, despite the fact that his monade theory is greatly inspired from Spinoza's monism. so he can't be 2nd will 0 2019-10-20 02:34:43pm (post #7257) |
related entries |