menu |
ILE-Ne
Socionics
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | |||||
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (21/09/08 09:21) camelmilk: ENTP |
(20/06/23 18:51) Thyssen: ENTP |
(20/05/26 16:13) tch: ENTP |
public function votes | (20/06/23 18:51) Thyssen: ENTP |
(20/05/26 16:13) tch: ENTP |
public enneagram votes | (21/09/08 09:21) camelmilk: 7w6 |
(20/06/23 18:51) Thyssen: 7w6 |
public instinctual variant votes | (21/09/08 09:21) camelmilk: sx/sp |
(20/06/23 18:51) Thyssen: sx/so |
public tritype® votes | (21/09/08 09:21) camelmilk: 784 |
(20/06/23 18:51) Thyssen: 749 |
public sociotype votes |
public psychosophy votes | (20/06/23 18:51) Thyssen: LFEV |
public hexaco votes |
nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi![]() ![]() 2025-07-17 05:40:25am (post #10145) |
Woll Smoth ![]() Regarding your confusion, I wouldn't worry about it. No typology model is going to be fully true, in other words most typology models/theories are very flawed (whether we are talking about MBTI, Socionics, Enneagram, etc.). Think of it as seeing someone's "best fit" type, many people are not going to perfectly fit into a type in some models but they usually have a "best fit" one if you get what I mean. ![]() 2025-07-16 10:10:12pm (post #10144) |
nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi![]() First of all this is confusing me for a while. the things is why not ENTJ ILE? or even ENTP SLE? ESTP ILE? Or even SLE and ILE have their stack function is (maybe) well, it's really the same or something like that. No? So can you helping me. Actually, I thought that ENTJ SLEs are impossible that had I think the socionics had it's leading Ti function over there, ENTJ have not using Ti on their stack. ![]() 2025-07-16 07:32:03pm (post #10142) |
related entries |