| public myers-briggs votes | (21/09/08 09:21) camelmilk: ENTP | | (20/06/23 18:51) Thyssen: ENTP |
| (20/05/26 16:13) tch: ENTP |
|
| public function votes | (20/06/23 18:51) Thyssen: ENTP | | (20/05/26 16:13) tch: ENTP |
|
| public enneagram votes | (21/09/08 09:21) camelmilk: 7w6 | | (20/06/23 18:51) Thyssen: 7w6 |
|
| public instinctual variant votes | (21/09/08 09:21) camelmilk: sx/sp | | (20/06/23 18:51) Thyssen: sx/so |
|
| public tritype® votes | (21/09/08 09:21) camelmilk: 784 | | (20/06/23 18:51) Thyssen: 749 |
|
| public psychosophy votes | (20/06/23 18:51) Thyssen: LFEV | |
Alright, enough thank you again.
IDRlabs themselves have stated that not only do they not use Socionics at all saying "We don’t use Socionics at all on this site and so whatever they postulate will have no bearing on the type assessments found here", but they also say that their conceptions of the functions differs greatly from Socioncis as well saying to a commenter who used a definition of Socio Te, "you throw this notion from Socionics out there, which I read as almost the complete inverse of Jung’s idea of the Te type." So yes, IDR is VERY different from Socionics. Not only are the conceptions of the functions different but they also seek to measure different things.