Lewis Carroll ~ MBTI, Enneagram, and Socionics Personality Type

Lewis Carroll ~ MBTI, Enneagram, and Socionics Personality Type

Lewis Carroll

e

i

n

s

f

t

p

j

function

ennea

variant

socio

psycho

INTP 3

INTJ 1

ENTP 1

5w4 3

7w6 1

9w1 1

sx/so 1

so/sx 1

sp/sx 1

sx/sp 1

LII 4

ILI 1

LEVF 1

VLEF 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

h

e

x

a

c

o

public myers-briggs votes

(20/12/13 19:07) Saturnian: INTP

(20/04/23 20:10) bibliology: INTP

(21/03/18 20:07) Tman: INTP

(19/01/21 23:26) Jacobus: INTP

public function votes

(25/07/01 08:30) nicotineseries: INTJ

(21/03/18 20:07) Tman: INTP

(20/12/13 19:07) Saturnian: INTP

(19/10/15 17:28) Phantom: INTP

public enneagram votes

(25/07/02 12:32) nicotineseries: 5w4

(21/03/18 19:44) Tman: 5w4

(20/12/13 19:07) Saturnian: 5w4

(19/01/27 13:02) Jacobus: 9w1

public instinctual variant votes

(25/07/02 12:32) nicotineseries: sx/sp

(20/12/13 19:07) Saturnian: sp/sx

(19/01/21 23:29) Jacobus: so/sx

public tritype® votes

(21/03/18 19:58) Tman: 549

(20/12/13 19:07) Saturnian: 549

public sociotype votes

(25/07/14 14:25) nicotineseries: LII

(21/03/18 20:08) Tman: LII

(20/12/13 19:07) Saturnian: ILI

(19/10/15 17:27) Phantom: LII

(19/01/21 23:28) Jacobus: LII

public psychosophy votes

(25/07/13 15:01) nicotineseries: VLEF

(19/10/15 17:29) Phantom: LEVF

public hexaco votes

nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi

Lol sorry, I seem to have misquoted the source of the evidence in my comment below. So, it was actually George MacDonald, his friend of a relative's acquaintance, aka a friend of this person's father who said that, guys. His family, especially himself, said so.

0
2025-07-16 12:25:12pm (post #10140)

nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi

So, well now I wrote this text and in truth not only what I've been said this isn't based on the research or even I didn't have any data to prove with. In fact, you can search it by yourself if you want and there is now that technology is advanced and sophisticated, so go ahead and find the evidence yourself and share it here. Then I'll try to change my mind. Okay! Thank you.

0
2025-07-11 12:05:19am (post #10113)

nicotineseries IXFP 6w5, 649 EII-Fi

In regards to the evidence of my Lewis Carroll voters

So, now I keep seeing that people would confuse this person with XNTP types when I saw on the MBTI community especially on the Personality Database or whatever a website could easily took someting until misunderstood it. I think of those voters or even according to any systems like IDRlabs cannot take thing seriously or at least until people would search this person (Lewis Carroll) it's deeper of an iceberg, like you got to dig diver it until your understand it. I agree or understand with what user Woll Smoth vote about Princess Ariel as an Se users and I compare that with this person (Lewis Carroll) and yeah and I know can imagine that too. If you want me to elaborate all of my research and reasons, I said I mean with this according to many website and biography videos I think people would judge it with Introversion and some people would arguing "yeah he is sound kind a high Ne users" and etc etc, but isn't. I really dig diver some new information about this probably 1 years ago and I've summarized it as best I can for evidence, but some of it may be missing or lacking because I'm too lazy to write it here. So, in short, this person is incline to hereticism and spiritualism and as users Woll Smoth said about ENFJs “the ENFJ tends to have an intellectual, even scholarly, side which they use to delve into abstract problems concerning the whole of society, if not the world. In truth, most ENFJs are quite comfortable juggling complex facts and challenging situations that require a firm grasp of the theory involved.” And I think again some people maybe said that "oh, it is because he is conservative anglican pious christian and pervert? Or even bad, he is a bad person 'cus pedophilia bla bla bla..." no it is not the main REASONS and I want to tell the truth, mostly because I hardly quoted none quotes on here because he is too private as a person and only be recorded at his letters or he's acquitances and I pleased to someone don't be too quick swiftly judging any others MBTI as a bad and unappropiated because one of the cognitive functions is different which makes you differentiate between other types. Okay so next by the way I'll shorten this I now compare it with any other famous person in IDRlabs one of them is with the INTJ personality, as I get the similarity with it is Isaac Newton and I yeah I get that the analogies between their behavior, thinking and yeah probably they're had an in commonly same and insanely it is so perfect that there is no difference at all! If so, you can check the truth of what I said earlier by reading his biography, autobiography, an interview with original sources such as his relatives, siblings, etc. Until you want the most extreme level, you can search and ask in the community and try to criticize which mistakes you want to state then tell me then I will change my way of thinking and my voters and give me questions (anything) up to you so I can state which errors and where my mistakes lie. Also one of his illustrator, Sir John Tenniel said that someone who a fussy and authoritarian behavior that demands everything to be perfect until the book is published. Well, maybe at this point there will be someone who will point to evidence in the form of a biographical film, right? It's fitting that I see the community criticizing some of the inconsistencies in the behavior in the film and the personality of the person behind his work. Actually, this Mr. Charles Lutwidge Dodgson or his anonymous name known as "Lewis Carroll" is indeed very difficult for us to understand for those who are unfamiliar and don't understand how this person's way of thinking. Indeed, when I read one of his biographies, it was quite surprising and confusing why this person was one of the people I analyzed who was the most different. And yes, I began to realize that he was actually a dominant intuitive and I think he did have an abstraction in creating a work that was very irrational and dependent on someone's imagination which made me definitely put him in the dominant intuitive category (and one of his friends, a member of the Rossetti family, said so). But I thought again, Why isn't Ne dominant, ENTP maybe because he is a thinker?, so what I just said is that this person is basically very abstract and has a few percent for him to be a Sensor because he can also master the intellectual field and academic conversations or something related to that. So I sorted him back to another possibility, namely Ni is dominant in his cognitive function. But there are also people who say that he is S, including IXTJ or something like that. "Oh, why not other introverts like IXXP or IXXJ, why do you say he is in the IXTJ category, IXTX is a heartless thinker or something..." Well, that's my opinion, yes, he might use Te because he is structured in other words regarding goals and targets. As the quote from user PDB (Personalty Database) said about the Tekken 8 character Jin Kazama "I agree that Jin is Ni dom but he seems more Te-Fi>Fe-Ti. In the Tekken 6 storyline (which is controversial but it's canon regardless of what people think) he seems so contingent to marshal facts for the sake of actualizing a personal goal." or "Jin's judgment seems tailored towards measurable solutions that are tailored towards a particular end, All else being equal, when criticizing something, an INTJ is more likely to put emphasis on the practicality of the idea than an INFJ, hence why he says "Does it really make a difference?" Another thing to consider is that, as IDRlabs puts it, "INTJs have auxiliary extroverted thinking. Since their thinking is directed outwards, they prefer for their judgments and plans to be oriented towards the actionable. While their ruminations and visions might be just as lofty as those of the INFJ, the concrete takeaways from their thoughts tend to be much easier to translate into practical reality. They want to construct a clear path from abstract vision to concrete reality; to shake the world with their thoughts in a way that makes the 'impossible' possible. This fits Jin well." And well, this is the conclusion yeah that it is, and if time permits, I will look for some quotes or more or less examples in his other autobiographical books.

0
2025-07-10 04:40:12pm (post #10111)

*related entries*
Philip K. Dick
Philip Marlowe
priest
Benito Mussolini
Yung Lean
Ted Cruz
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Ezra Pound Poet
Think & Grow Rich Self-Help Book
Ursula K. Le Guin
Peter Abelard Philosopher, epistolarian
August Strindberg Swedish Playwright