menu |
Ludwig Wittgenstein
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (21/03/18 22:10) Darkstar: INTJ |
(20/05/31 15:01) bibliology: INTJ |
(21/03/18 17:47) Tman: INTJ |
(19/05/12 22:23) Jacobus: INxJ |
(18/11/10 18:07) tch: INTJ |
(18/07/08 02:13) Zethmal: INTJ |
(18/06/24 07:38) LVNA: INTJ |
(19/03/22 07:45) Diobono: INTJ |
public function votes | (22/03/02 00:04) Woll Smoth: INFJ |
(21/03/18 22:10) Darkstar: INFJ |
(20/07/05 07:41) Flower-like: INFJ |
(20/01/15 15:19) Lol: INFJ |
(19/05/12 21:41) Jacobus: INFJ |
(19/03/23 21:15) tman: INTJ |
(19/01/02 23:19) tch: INFJ |
(18/07/10 04:44) fg: INFJ |
(18/06/24 10:55) Diobono: INFJ |
public enneagram votes | (21/03/18 22:10) Darkstar: 5w4 |
(20/01/18 11:41) bibliology: 5w4 |
(19/03/23 21:15) tman: 5w4 |
(19/05/12 22:17) Jacobus: 1w9 |
(18/07/08 02:13) Zethmal: 5w4 |
(18/06/24 07:38) LVNA: 5w4 |
(18/06/24 10:56) Diobono: 5w4 |
public instinctual variant votes | (21/03/18 22:10) Darkstar: sx/sp |
(20/01/18 11:41) bibliology: sx/sp |
(19/10/07 11:08) Tman: sx/sp |
(18/12/28 23:17) Jacobus: sx/sp |
(18/06/24 07:38) LVNA: sp/so |
public tritype® votes | (21/03/18 22:10) Darkstar: 514 |
(20/01/18 11:41) bibliology: 514 |
(19/03/26 13:30) tman: 514 |
public sociotype votes | (23/08/11 00:04) Woll Smoth: LII |
(21/03/18 22:10) Darkstar: LSI |
(20/10/31 05:15) Diobono: LII |
(20/10/30 18:22) Flower-like: LSI |
(20/02/03 22:45) bibliology: LII |
(20/01/25 12:28) zazu: LII |
(19/10/21 00:36) tch: LII |
(19/05/07 08:49) Avalonia: LSI |
(20/07/04 22:01) Tman: LSI |
(19/01/09 21:12) Jacobus: LSI |
(18/07/10 04:44) fg: LII |
(18/06/24 07:38) LVNA: LII |
public psychosophy votes | (20/10/13 21:37) Flower-like: VLEF |
(19/11/10 20:07) Tman: VLEF |
(19/10/15 20:42) Jacobus: VLEF |
public hexaco votes |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI Also, Betas tend to value bold, dramatic displaces of rhetoric. So for example, waving around a fire poker in a philosophy debate in order to make a point. So now I turn the question back to you. Why do you suspect he's a Delta? ![]() 2020-10-11 07:22:13pm (post #8496) |
Flower-like INFP 4 ![]() ![]() 2020-10-11 04:40:18pm (post #8495) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2020-10-09 04:16:11pm (post #8494) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI But above all else, if you think he's LII, why not vote LII?! ![]() 2020-10-09 01:57:43pm (post #8493) |
Flower-like INFP 4 ![]() ![]() 2020-10-09 10:22:16am (post #8492) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI![]() 2020-10-08 04:41:59pm (post #8491) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() Russell, on the other hand, had a much more democratic character and worldview. He claimed that he would refuse to die for his beliefs, as he wasn't sure if he was right (L>V). His relationship with Wittgenstein became more and more constrained as the latter moved further away from the logic of the Tractatus toward what Russell saw as mysticism. ![]() 2019-11-10 12:57:14pm (post #7383) |
Crescens ![]() ![]() 2019-10-03 12:05:19am (post #7189) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI![]() 2019-09-05 10:37:32pm (post #7053) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() "The World and Life are one. Physiological life is of course not "Life". And neither is psychological life. Life is the world. Ethics does not treat of the world. Ethics must be a condition of the world, like logic. Ethics and Aesthetics are one." "It is true: Man is the microcosm: I am my world." "Frazer's account of the magical and religious views of mankind is unsatisfactory; it makes these views look like errors." The thinkers he admired most were NF types (in both MBTI and Socionics): Kierkegaard, Dostoevsky, Augustine, and so on. ![]() 2018-12-13 02:29:23pm (post #4217) |
LVNA ![]() ![]() 2018-07-10 04:18:04pm (post #2039) |
diobono int 5w4 ili![]() There is not necessarily a Ti framework of Laws from which a system is created but more of Ni first mental imagery which seems strong to me from what i have read of him. He did rely strongly on mental imagery if i recall and was not overly schematic. He changed his mind too often to be a lii and after the tractatus he sort of steered direction in his work in a way a socionics Ti dominant is not likely to do . For Example Noam Chomsky and Plato who are clear LIIs. Even if their work was shifting in the course of their lives they never really just completely changed direction. Of course this is super hypothethical given i am not too familiar with him. ![]() 2018-07-10 12:21:32pm (post #2016) |
Diobono int 5w4 ili![]() ![]() 2018-06-24 10:58:13am (post #1449) |
related entries |