menu |
Andrei Tarkovsky
Film Director
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (21/02/24 23:13) Darkstar: INFP |
(20/06/04 11:51) bibliology: INFJ |
(19/09/14 06:07) Diobono: INFP |
(19/05/12 23:12) Jacobus: INFJ |
(19/01/04 17:33) LVNA: INFP |
(18/08/26 07:10) exdeath: INFJ |
(18/12/14 11:21) EON: INFP |
public function votes | (21/02/24 23:13) Darkstar: INFJ |
(20/03/18 13:18) Jacobus: INFJ |
(19/10/21 15:45) bibliology: INFJ |
public enneagram votes | (21/02/24 23:13) Darkstar: 4w5 |
(19/10/21 15:45) bibliology: 4w5 |
(19/09/14 13:29) LVNA: 5w4 |
(19/09/14 06:07) Diobono: 4w5 |
(19/05/12 23:12) Jacobus: 5w4 |
(18/05/06 08:40) EON: 4w5 |
public instinctual variant votes | (21/02/24 23:13) Darkstar: sp/sx |
(19/10/21 15:45) bibliology: sp/sx |
(18/08/22 12:17) LVNA: sp/sx |
public tritype® votes | (21/02/24 23:13) Darkstar: 451 |
(19/10/21 15:45) bibliology: 415 |
(18/09/13 01:58) LVNA: 451 |
public sociotype votes | (21/02/24 23:13) Darkstar: ILI |
(19/09/14 06:07) Diobono: ILI |
(19/05/12 23:12) Jacobus: ILI |
(22/11/30 13:55) ruboline: LSI |
(19/01/03 23:34) AuÅ¡ra AugustinaviÄiÅ«tÄ—: LII |
(18/08/26 14:08) LVNA: ILI |
public psychosophy votes | (20/02/29 20:05) Jacobus: EVLF |
public hexaco votes |
LVNA "We can express our feelings regarding the world around us either by poetic or by descriptive means. I prefer to express myself metaphorically. Let me stress: metaphorically, not symbolically. A symbol contains within itself a definite meaning, certain intellectual formula, while metaphor is an image. An image possessing the same distinguishing features as the world it represents. An image — as opposed to a symbol — is indefinite in meaning. One cannot speak of the infinite world by applying tools that are definite and finite. We can analyse the formula that constitutes a symbol, while metaphor is a being-within-itself, it's a monomial. It falls apart at any attempt of touching it." Where is the rationality here? He seems to place the creation of aesthetic worlds and perspectives that are subjective in nature above co-opting the seeds of these to plant them in a more Apollonian form. I'm not sure what his type would be really, though. Something Ni - Fi, yes that is sure. “Let everything that’s been planned come true. Let them believe. And let them have a laugh at their passions. Because what they call passion actually is not some emotional energy, but just the friction between their souls and the outside world. And most important, let them believe in themselves. Let them be helpless like children, because weakness is a great thing, and strength is nothing. When a man is just born, he is weak and flexible. When he dies, he is hard and insensitive. When a tree is growing, it’s tender and pliant. But when it’s dry and hard, it dies. Hardness and strength are death’s companions. Pliancy and weakness are expressions of the freshness of being. Because what has hardened will never win.” In general this seems like a person whose ideas are guided more by images than whose images are guided by underlying ideas. Would be interested in hearing what the thought process for EII is though. 0 2018-07-27 02:52:20am (post #2415) |
related entries |