menu |
Jacobus
Sakinorva Databank
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (20/11/26 15:17) Flower-like: INFJ |
(20/05/01 18:05) fleetingpetals1: INFP |
(20/02/13 15:13) Thyssen: INFJ |
(20/01/08 23:12) Tch: INF |
(20/01/28 02:20) Jacobus: INFJ |
(21/01/02 20:47) Tman: INFJ |
(19/05/30 10:38) fg: INFJ |
(19/05/06 21:31) Teru Mikami: INTJ |
(19/02/08 16:02) Taco110: INFJ |
(20/11/19 23:25) LadyX: INFJ |
public function votes | (20/06/10 11:23) Flower-like: INFJ |
(20/04/20 01:08) fleetingpetals1: INFJ |
(19/11/25 20:30) Tman: INFJ |
(19/10/23 18:26) Jacobus: INFJ |
public enneagram votes | (19/11/25 22:00) Thyssen: 4wb |
(20/11/20 01:18) Jacobus: 4w5 |
(20/08/12 16:26) Tman: 4wb |
(19/10/16 04:42) fg: 4w3 |
(19/02/09 03:08) Phantom: 4w5 |
(19/02/08 16:02) Taco110: 4w5 |
(19/05/06 21:31) Teru Mikami: 1w9 |
(20/11/19 23:25) LadyX: 4w5 |
public instinctual variant votes | (20/08/16 23:47) LadyX: sx/sp |
(20/08/12 16:26) Tman: sx/sp |
(19/11/25 22:00) Thyssen: sx/sp |
public tritype® votes | (20/11/20 01:20) Jacobus: 416 |
(20/11/19 23:25) LadyX: 451 |
(20/05/02 14:55) Tman: 416 |
(19/11/14 22:52) Thyssen: 461 |
public sociotype votes | (20/10/19 02:07) Flower-like: EIE |
(20/03/30 15:31) fleetingpetals1: IEI |
(20/02/16 17:35) Thyssen: IEI |
(20/11/15 15:45) Tman: EIE |
(19/10/23 18:26) Jacobus: EIE |
(19/10/16 03:21) Diobono: IEI |
(19/05/23 05:57) fg: EII |
public psychosophy votes | (20/07/27 04:57) Flower-like: VELF |
(20/05/29 01:58) fleetingpetals1: EVLF |
(20/07/02 17:51) Tman: ELVF |
(19/10/24 11:12) fg: EFVL |
(19/10/18 00:02) LadyX: VELF |
(19/10/15 23:03) Thyssen: ELVF |
(19/10/15 20:07) Jacobus: VELF |
public hexaco votes | (19/10/18 00:02) LadyX: HEXACO |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2020-12-02 09:22:23pm (post #8594) |
Flower-like INFP 4 ![]() Expressing one's thoughts on the internet does definitely differ from 'real life', because first, there is no possibility of hand gestures, of any gestures, of tone, of action, of eye contact, of context, of handwriting, of the possibility to debate the very thing that you are debating through (the internet), people's writing is also naturally deprived of these things because the emotional potency of language has been lessened due to the option of using an emoji, and on the forums 'debates' are drawn out for desert-long days, miscommunication and Discord prevail, you are forced to order your thoughts in organized ways rather than allow them to be spontaneous, you do not share the surroundings of the other - who is the other? and people's relationship to the screen and experience of the screen as one source (at any time or of all time) are different. That post about 'expression' was just that I was trying to perform that 'expression' can be more complicated and diverse than just writing out 'silly' posts on the internet. The content of it doesn't really have any meaning. "Or that is has nothing to do with expression and is set aside and so as a rule no expression will follow from it?" This means that somebody properly fills out a form. And how would you know that Jacobus doesn't behave according the the rules of good form in society when on the internet there are barely any rules of good form? Or, as I said above, there is no context, I am sure that you live in Brazil and I am sure that Jacob, probably from the US, doesn't, the 'societies' are different (even though America is the World). To be detached is not a bad thing when it is right to be detached. Why would he open himself up to eternal strangers? ![]() 2020-12-02 03:17:56pm (post #8592) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2020-11-27 08:40:21pm (post #8589) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2020-11-27 03:26:04pm (post #8586) |
Flower-like INFP 4 ![]() But I will leave this now, I don't want to blemish Jacobus's page anymore, and I hope that I haven't. ![]() 2020-11-27 12:55:02pm (post #8585) |
Flower-like INFP 4 ![]() There is also a great difference between communication and internet communication, for instance, a 2L (this is unrelated to Jacobus) may have trouble expressing his thoughts on the internet because it is closer to written communication, though not entirely, and Socrates himself did not write anything but was instead written down, his style of thinking was communicative; Socrates would suffer on the internet. This principle may apply to many other aspects of many other types and also things that have nothing to do with typology. ![]() 2020-11-27 09:51:43am (post #8584) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2020-11-26 10:36:35pm (post #8582) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2020-11-26 10:19:52pm (post #8580) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() You sort of recognize that the primary manner through which I view the world, at least by functions, is subjective intuition. I am never inclined to perceive things by their material/objective form primarily, but to try and look inside them (not in a literal sense, of course). I place everything in a context: I have a negative view of technological advancement because it is in opposition to moral-spiritual advancement; I have a generally positive view of monarchic and authoritarian governments because it is only by the will of a Great Teacher figure that the masses may be guided towards capital-t Truth (which itself is monadic in structure). The details fade away into the whole. You should already be able to see FeTi. In irl relations, I am empathetic and self-concealing. I concern myself with the emotional structure and atmosphere of the room; I avoid vulgarity and, if possible and desirable, I present my views in the most polite manner. When I'm sincerely angry or have contempt for someone are the exceptions, of course. There is no "reading the room" in comment sections on typology sites, so I don't feel the need to do any of that here. On a psychological level, I do not see my beliefs as being my own. Human knowledge and culture are mythical in nature (that isn't to say constructed), pointing to an ideal ur-form. Which parts of the overall mythic spirit the individual accepts or rejects is mostly due to their innate or self-created personal traits, but one's own beliefs still are not truly unique. Also: 1. I actually like tman, though I admit I rarely show it. 2. Yes, I am always right. ![]() 2020-11-26 09:32:22pm (post #8578) |
Flower-like INFP 4 ![]() "Auditor as if constantly monitors revisee, drawing attention to his weak spot. The impression is that the auditor constantly wants to figure out what revisee is doing and how he is doing it. Revisee often gets the impression that he is being watched all the time alike a guinea pig. However, this does not mean that the auditor always verbally points out perceived shortcomings of revisee. Revisee internally feels that the auditor can do so at any time and, therefore, initially in his presence revisee exists in a state of tension. Auditor seems like a significant person; how he acts deserves attention. Revisee wants to earn recognition of the auditor, his praise is much appreciated. However, the revisor always underestimates the revisee and perceives his thoughts and actions as insignificant, which incites resentment in the revisee. At first, revisee may be encouraged by this and want to prove his usefulness to the auditor, but all attempts are unsuccessful. The revisor seems smug and petty; he finds faults, tries to teach and re-educate the revisee. Revisee seems interesting and capable, but he is missing something and seems to require help and suggestions. However, all advice proves useless; revisee does not accept it, which further increases the desire of auditor to re-audit. Revisee seems stupid not because he is unable (which is how it actually is), but simply because it's as if he does not want to listen. This periodically causes frustration for the auditor. These relations may be called "guardianship" of auditor over the audited, which can be very annoying for the later. Sensing his vulnerability, revisee is inclined to make attempts to escape this control, especially around other people: he one-ups the auditor, tries to argue with him, gives him orders. However, such attempts are fruitless. Auditor, as a rule, does not take offense but continues with his re-education attempts. Sometimes supervision couple is very tightly knit together. This is because both people can feel their social significance: the auditor as the guardian or the benefactor, without whose care and guidance the audited would be lost, and audited - as the object of care, whose value is recognized in this way. In relations of benefit, this feeling is much less expressed, because the benefactor does not make attempts to re-educate his beneficiary." ![]() 2020-11-26 01:45:58pm (post #8576) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI![]() 2020-11-22 10:41:16pm (post #8569) |
Flower-like INFP 4 ![]() ![]() 2020-11-22 04:01:48pm (post #8566) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI![]() 2020-11-22 03:44:11pm (post #8565) |
Flower-like INFP 4 ![]() ![]() 2020-11-22 02:36:01pm (post #8563) |
Flower-like INFP 4 ![]() ![]() 2020-11-22 02:35:50pm (post #8562) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI![]() 2020-11-22 01:46:12pm (post #8561) |
Flower-like INFP 4 ![]() ![]() 2020-11-19 11:08:47am (post #8552) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() I guess I can illustrate some things clearer by saying that the two famous figures I relate to the most are Yukio Mishima and Maximilien Robespierre. They were rather different in a lot of ways, but both showed the desire to conform to a personal ideal and to remake the world around them into something more beautiful and pure. ![]() 2020-11-11 05:09:32pm (post #8540) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2020-08-17 11:52:20pm (post #8446) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2020-08-17 11:48:17pm (post #8445) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI Jacobus fits a type 6 or 7 description much more then she does a type 5. She not only has a fierce loyalism to a particular tradition (Christian/Buddhist Gnosticism), but she also overwhelmingly opposes anything she views as in opposition to that tradition (Check out her comments on Paganism and Transhumanism.) Of course, to an extent, this to be expected. Everybody has ideas they don't like, and many people have a religious tradition. But Jacobus tends to take it farther then I think most people would, in a very 6ish manner. As for type 7, Jacobus tends to have a lot of goals, I think she wanted to be a writer, a philosopher, a director, an actor, ext. Then when she was asked how she wanted to accomplish these goals, she said, and I quote, "you focus to much on the details." Nuf said there. I'm sorry so much of this seems kinda like heavy handed criticism, Ennegram is mostly based in flaws, so that's what I've had to focus on. ![]() 2020-08-17 01:16:20pm (post #8444) |
LadyX intp 5 ![]() ![]() 2020-08-17 12:00:07am (post #8443) |
LadyX intp 5 ![]() This sounds like a textbook "5". Any reason you don't think you follow the Enneagram 5 pattern? ![]() 2020-08-16 11:46:11pm (post #8442) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() Also, I've never really had a stressful life. My mother could have been around more and my father (and various guardian figures) could have been less critical of me when I was a kid, but so far I've had a rather boring life and I'm unhappy about that. Part of the problem is that I've always felt the need to dream about living other lives to escape to escape mundane reality. To make my dreams into reality, no matter what, is essentially my life-long goal. ![]() 2020-08-12 11:26:42pm (post #8438) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI![]() 2020-08-12 07:01:31pm (post #8436) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2020-08-12 05:54:01pm (post #8435) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() DARKNESS IMPRISONING ME ![]() 2020-03-30 04:54:26pm (post #7830) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() Alexander was as much aware as anyone that his insatiable quest for an abstract glory would doom both him and his empire. Like Achilles, he fought on, knowing that future generations would love him for his madness. ![]() 2020-03-30 04:53:36pm (post #7829) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() H: 3.44 E: 3.00 X: 3.13 A: 2.13 C: 2.88 O: 4.63 Some of the results are obviously a bit exaggerated, since it's a short test. ![]() 2019-11-26 07:33:26pm (post #7470) |
Thyssen ILI Not A Lurker Anymore ![]() ![]() 2019-11-26 02:06:52pm (post #7469) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2019-11-26 01:56:43pm (post #7468) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2019-11-10 12:33:20pm (post #7382) |
LadyX intp 5 ![]() ![]() 2019-10-23 10:46:58pm (post #7297) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() If the both of you feel the need to become combatitive over an imagined system of personality, very well. This will not help to deflect the image you have created for me, but I find that the feeling of you two on my back would be a tad too much of a nuisance for me. I sincerely apologize if I harmed any of you in some manner. It's not improbable that I will return, even return soon, but for now, adieu. ![]() 2019-10-23 06:25:37pm (post #7294) |
fg xxTJ 6w5 Beta ST![]() ![]() 2019-10-23 04:34:58pm (post #7292) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() I'm not sure as to how you extrapolated this supposed information about me from my posts. You have mentioned before, I believe, that you are lacking somewhat in social and emotional awareness. If you still see this quality in yourself, then I believe that is the reason that you read certain personality traits into my posts where there are none. Quite frankly, you seem to take this site and this community much more seriously than I do. I simply don't feel the need to explain myself exactly, or to be perfectly clear, or to bother myself with the affairs of online strangers. My posts (on here, on discord, wherever) can be ironic, and personality is something too amorphic for me to waste time attempting to find an air-tight reasoning for everything. Every typing on here is primarily impressionistic, for long-dead historical figures that's even more so. There's never a need to become angry or argumentative over personality types. And I know that you aren't ISTP. Take a joke. ![]() 2019-10-23 04:00:33pm (post #7290) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2019-10-16 12:45:48pm (post #7250) |
strawberry crisis enfp 7 ![]() ![]() 2019-10-16 10:53:06am (post #7249) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() It's difficult to explain why I believe I have 1st Will without sounding arrogant. Frankly, I have always felt that I deserve fame and prestige, so I am constantly seeking to ensure that I deserve fame and prestige. ![]() 2019-10-16 03:19:25am (post #7246) |
Teru Mikami Are you intuitive or do you follow the state? ![]() ![]() 2019-06-02 08:14:49pm (post #6279) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2019-05-30 05:07:38pm (post #6198) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() INFP: (-7, 10, 6, 1) ![]() 2019-03-02 04:42:28pm (post #5505) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2019-03-02 02:59:03pm (post #5496) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() rheti enneagram type: 4w5 tritype: 451 Most likely m-b (raw): INTJ Most likely m-b (comparative): INTP test 2: most likely real m-b type: INFJ most likely fake m-b type: INFP ![]() 2019-02-26 11:58:20pm (post #5460) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2019-02-20 02:31:20pm (post #5353) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2019-02-20 12:57:19pm (post #5351) |
LadyX intp 5 ![]() possibly worth a listen: https://personalityhacker.com/podcast-episode-0264-the-make-your-mark-myth/ ![]() 2019-02-08 01:22:50am (post #5200) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2019-02-07 09:11:22pm (post #5197) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE![]() ![]() 2019-02-07 09:03:38pm (post #5196) |
related entries |