menu |
T. S. Eliot
Poet
e | i |
n | s |
f | t |
p | j |
function | ennea | variant | socio | psycho | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 1 |
h |
e |
x |
a |
c |
o |
public myers-briggs votes | (20/11/07 19:46) Tman: INFJ |
(20/04/07 23:37) zayeh: INTJ |
(19/07/30 10:19) Diobono: INTJ |
(19/05/06 20:26) Jacobus: INTJ |
public function votes | (20/11/16 16:10) Tman: INTJ |
public enneagram votes | (20/11/16 16:11) Tman: 1w9 |
(19/07/30 10:19) Diobono: 5w4 |
(19/05/06 20:26) Jacobus: 5w4 |
public instinctual variant votes | (20/11/16 16:11) Tman: sp/so |
(19/05/06 20:26) Jacobus: so/sp |
public tritype® votes | (20/11/16 16:11) Tman: 164 |
public sociotype votes | (19/05/06 20:26) Jacobus: LII |
public psychosophy votes | (20/11/22 20:30) Jacobus: LVEF |
(20/11/16 16:12) Tman: LFEV |
public hexaco votes |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE I don't think you sincerely believe that. That's such a bad excuse. Read over the definition again, if you really need to. https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&tab=wT&authuser=0&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aleafan.org%2Fbooks%2Fsintaksislubvi%2Fsintaksislubvi90.html 0 2020-11-23 09:33:03pm (post #8573) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI Eliot defined himself largely by his national and racial heritage, rather then trying to figure out for himself who he was. V last can lead to egalitarianism, unless the V 4th finds something outside of himself which he can use to define himself. 0 2020-11-23 07:17:29pm (post #8572) |
Flower-like INFP 4 Sex is generally to do with the combination of F and E I read somewhere, especially Dumas. 0 2020-11-23 05:46:01am (post #8571) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE F is explicitly tied to the material world: the body, money, food, etc. Eliot showed a lack of concern for such things. And if you view Eliot as an elitist and bigot, why did you type him as 4V, which is even more humble and egalitarian to the point of having almost no sense of self? 0 2020-11-23 12:09:05am (post #8570) |
Tman INTP 5w4/1w9/4w5 Sx/Sp ILI Is F necessarily the same as Sex? It's always been a bit poorly defined, but I thought it was broader then that. An F first might be prone to over indulgence, but an F second is very often controlled and restrained in there physical indulgence. I thought it could just as easily be tied to being "grounded" in practical matters as it did sensory matters. I will tell you what a I don't see, which is V 2nd. V 2nd is known for there sense of egalitarianism, which sure doesn't fit with an elitist snob and Bigot like Eliot. 0 2020-11-22 10:36:57pm (post #8568) |
Jacobus INFJ 4w5 EIE tman can you please tell me how the fuck Eliot, one of the most sexless and ascetic poets in all of literature, could be 2F? 0 2020-11-22 08:29:47pm (post #8567) |
related entries |